6

The Cartan-Brauer-Hua theorem states that

Let $K\subset D$ be division rings so that whenever $x\in D$ is a nonzero element, $xKx^{-1}\subset K$. Show that either $K\subset Z(D)$ or $K=D$.

This theorem is partially named after Hua due to his 1-liner proof:

If $ab\neq ba$, then $$a=(b^{-1}-(a-1)^{-1}b^{-1}(a-1))(a^{-1}b^{-1}a-(a-1)^{-1}b^{-1}(a-1))^{-1}$$

It is all very nice, but the point is, how did all these come up? It is not obvious even if it has been written out, but how the h*ll was this constructed? What was the intuition?

BAI
  • 2,623
  • Duplicate of https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3090668/29335. – rschwieb Aug 26 '19 at 02:22
  • I too have struggled with one of Hua’s identities, here which coincidentally is linked to that question. I don’t know immediately if this is a version of the same identity. I don’t know if anyone really has a good explanation... – rschwieb Aug 26 '19 at 02:27

0 Answers0