Suppose one is asked to explain why the real valued function
$$f(x) = \sqrt[3]{x}$$
is not differentiable at $x = 0$ and gives the following argument: For $x \neq 0$, one has
$$f'(x) = \frac{1}{3\sqrt[3]{x^2}}$$
and this is not defined for $x = 0$. Is this a perfectly valid argument? In my opinion, it is not since $f'(0)$ is a limit and it $\textit{could}$ be that the limit nevertheless exists. I mean the following: If one says that $f'(0)$ does not exists because $\frac{1}{3 \cdot 0}$ is not defined, one implicitly assumes that $f'$ is continuous at $x = 0$, or? I think, that the correct answer would be, that
$$\lim_{x \to 0} f'(x) = \infty.$$
(My question arises from the point that a function could have a limit in a point, although it is not defined there. Suppose for example you have $g(x) = \frac{x}{x}$. Then $g$ is not defined at $x = 0$ but $\lim_{x \to 0} g (x) = 1$.)