If I'm understanding this correctly, then the biggest triangle we can make has vertices $(0,1),(1,1),$ and $(0,0)$.
You're right, that's the support of your random (multivariate) variable.
If this is the case then the probability should be 1.
Huh... what? What you know is that "total" probability is $1$, i.e. $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f_{X,Y}(x,y) dx dy=1$. Now, because the density here is constant, denoting by $S$ the support region and by $A_S$ its area we get
$\int_{S} 2 dx dy= 2 \, A_S= 1$ and this is indeed true, because the area of the triange is $\frac12$. Then, it's all right.
As $x$ increases, $y$ can at least be $x$ which means that $y$ is dependent on $x$.
Yes. In fact, if you have a bounded support that it's not a rectangle, (or a cartesian product of rectangles) then the variables are dependent.
You have the joint density $f_{X,Y}$. To get the single variable ("marginal") density, you sum (integrate) over the other variable ("marginalize") :
$$ f_X(x)=\int f_{X,Y}(x,y) dy $$
Because the density is constant, and the support is known, what remains is just to get the integrations limits right, i.e. which is the range for the integrating variable ($y$) for each fixed $x$. Can you go on from here?