2

Let’s define a group quasiword as an element of $F_\infty \times P(F_\infty)$. Suppose $Q \subset F_\infty \times P(F_\infty)$ is a set of quasiwords. Define a quasivariety described by $Q$ as a class of all groups $G$, such that $\forall (w, A) \in Q, h \in Hom(F_\infty, G), (h(A) = \{e\} \to h(w) = e)$. One can easily see, that all group varieties actually are quasivarieties.

Now, suppose $\mathfrak{U}_Q$ is a quasivariety described by $Q$. And $G$ is a group. Does there always exist the unique minimal normal subgroup $V_Q(G)$, such that $\frac{G}{V_Q(G)} \in \mathfrak{U}_Q$ (lets call such subgroup quasiverbal). In the particular case, when $\mathfrak{U}_Q$ is a variety one can easily see that such subgroup always exist and is exactly the verbal subgroup, corresponding to that variety. However, whats about the general case?

I tried to prove the existence of quasiverbal subgroups using Zorn’s lemma. However, it was not a success, as I failed to prove, that in $\{H \triangleleft G| \frac{G}{H} \in \mathfrak{U}_Q\}$ any descending chain has a lower bound.

Chain Markov
  • 16,012
  • "Quasivariety" is already a notion (class closed under subalgebras, isomorphisms, and reduced products). Does it match your use? – Arturo Magidin Apr 07 '19 at 13:21

1 Answers1

3

I’m not positive what you mean by $P(F_{\infty})$ (permutations on $F_{\infty}$?). But it seems clear from your definition that given a class $\mathfrak{U}_{Q}$,

  1. If $G\in\mathfrak{U}_{Q}$ and $H\leq G$, then $H\in\mathfrak{U}_Q$;
  2. If $\{G_i\}_{i\in I}$ is a family of groups in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$, then $\prod G_i\in\mathfrak{U}_Q$.
  3. If $G\in\mathfrak{U}_Q$ and $G\cong K$, then $K\in\mathfrak{U}_Q$.

(I’m not quite sure yet if the class is closed under reduced products, and hence would match the standard use of quasivariety; maybe that is what you are using, just with a definition somewhat different than I’m used to).

In particular, suppose that $N_i$ is the collection of all normal subgroups of $G$ such that $G/N_i\in\mathfrak{U}_Q$. Clearly the family is nonempty, since $G/G$ lies in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$. Consider the canonical map $G\to \prod_i (G/N_i)$. The kernel is exactly $\cap N_i$. The map induces an embedding of $G/(\cap N_i)$ into $\prod_i(G/N_i)$. But the latter is in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$ (product of groups in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$), and hence the $G/(\cap N_i)$ is (isomorphic to) a subgroup of a group in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$, and hence lies in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$ itself. Clearly, $N=\cap_i N_i$ is the least normal subgroup with the property that the quotient of $G$ lies in $\mathfrak{U}_Q$, and hence is your “quasiverbal subgroup”.

Arturo Magidin
  • 417,286
  • 3
    My guess is that $P(F_{\infty})$ means the power set of the free group on $\omega$-many generators. Then the word "quasivariety" in the question actually means "prevariety", i.e., class closed under $I$, $S$, $P$. – Keith Kearnes Apr 07 '19 at 15:35
  • @KeithKearnes That interpretation certainly makes more sense than my guess of “permutations”. So OP is using the wrong term, perhaps unaware the classes already have a name. Thanks. – Arturo Magidin Apr 07 '19 at 15:42
  • 1
    Prevariety versus quasivariety: let $C$ be a class of groups closed under the formation of subgroups. The prevariety generated by $C$ is the class of residually-$C$ groups. But the quasivariety generated by $C$ includes all ``locally residually-$C$ groups''. For example, if $C$ is the class of finite groups, then the locally finite simple group Alt($\omega$) is not in the prevariety generated by the class of finite groups, but it is in the quasivariety generated by the class of finite groups. – Keith Kearnes Apr 07 '19 at 16:49