5

Tried: Seems the ten-digit number ends with $240$ or $640$ or $840$ (Is not true, there are more ways the number could end)

$8325971640,$ $8365971240,$ $8317956240,$ $8291357640,$ $8325971640,$ $8235971640,$ $1357689240,$ $1283579640,$ $1783659240,$ $1563729840,$ $1763529840,$ $1653729840,$ $7165239840,$ $7195236840,$ $2165937840,$ $9283579640$

  • any multiple of 27720 is a multiple of all those numbers up to 11. Not sure what else they re asking – Will Jagy Oct 27 '18 at 00:11
  • maybe I understand. Divisibility by 9 is automatic here. The digits add up to 45. For 11, we need to choose a group of four digits and a group of five digits, so the sums differ by a multiple of 11, yet add to 45. So, 28+17 = 45 or 39+6 = 45. We cannot use the second one because four digits ad up to bigger than 6, so five (distinct) digits (including the highest 10^9 place) add to either 17 or 28. – Will Jagy Oct 27 '18 at 00:21
  • 100 place a and 10 place b, we need $100a + 10b \equiv 0 \pmod 8,$ or $4a+2b \equiv 0 \pmod 8,$ or $2a + b \equiv 0 \pmod 4. $ The choices become 120, 320, 520, 720, 920; 240, 440, 640, 840 where 440 has a repeat. then 160, 360,560,760,960; 280, 480, 680, 880 which is a repeat – Will Jagy Oct 27 '18 at 00:26
  • Found the answer 2438195760, 3785942160, 4753869120 and 4876391520 –  Oct 27 '18 at 00:48
  • those four are divisible by all the numbers from 1 through 18, but not 19. – Will Jagy Oct 27 '18 at 01:03
  • True, the question does sound like it’s looking for a ten-digit number just divisible by 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10&11. Though I think it is okay that they are divisible by 1 through 18. –  Oct 27 '18 at 01:13
  • It is, by definition, okay. :) – The Count Oct 27 '18 at 02:32

5 Answers5

5

Suppose the number is of form $N=jihgfedcba$. We may write:

$a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+(10-1)b+(10^2-1)c+(10^3-1)d+(10^4-1)e+(10^5-1)f+(10^6-1)g+(10^7-1)h+(10^8-1)i+(10^9-1)j$

A: Any number such as following forms are divisible by 2, 4, 5 and 8:

$(2k)(40)$ such as $240, 440, 640, 840 . . .$

$(2k+1)(20)$, such as $120, 320, 520, 720, . . .$

B: Whatever the value of g is, the term $\frac{10^6-1}{9}$ is divisible by $77$.

C: For 7 we consider the remainder of $10^n-1$ when divided by 7:

$T=.....10, 10^2, 10^3, 10^4, 10^5, 10^6, 10^7, 10^8, 10^9$

$R_{10^n}=...3,..2,.. 6,.. 4,.. 5,... 1,.. 3,.. 2,.. 6$

$R_{10^n-1}=2,..1,..5,..3,...4,...0,...2,..1,..5$

We can make following relation for divisibility by 7:

$a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+(2)b+(1)c+(5)d+(3)e+(4)f+(0)g+(2)h+(1)i+(5)j≡ mod 7$

D: For 11 we just consider the remainder of $10^n-1$ for odd n because for even n,. $(10^n-1)$ is divisible by 11 :

$T= .......10,....10^3,...10^5,...10^7,..10^9$

$R_{10^n}=...-1,...-1,...-1,...-1,..-1$

$R_{10^n-1}=-2,...-2,...-2,...-2,..-2$

So we can make following relation for divisibility by 11:

$a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+(-2)b+(-2)d+(-2)f+(-2)h+(-2)j≡ mod 11$

So we have following system of Diophantine equations:

$a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+(-2)b+(-2)d+(-2)f+(-2)h+(-2)j≡ mod 11$

$a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+(2)b+(1)c+(5)d+(3)e+(4)f+(0)g+(2)h+(1)i+(5)j≡ mod 7$

The sum $a+b+c+. . .i+j= \frac{9(9+1)}{2}=45$ is divisible by 3 and 9. This system of equations indicates that the question can have numerous solutions, to find one for example take $cba=840$ which is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8, That is we assume $a=0$, $b=4$ and $c=8$ and look for other digits as follows, we have:

$45+4\times2+8\times1+5d+3e+4f+2h+i+5j≡ mod 7$

Or:

$61+5d+3e+4f+2h+i+5j≡ mod 7$

$45-2\times 4-2(d+f+h+j)=37-2(d+f+h+j)≡ mod 11$

Suppose $37-2(d+f+h+j)=11$$d+f+h+j=(37-11)/2=13$

Suppose $d=1, . f=2,.h=3,. and,..j=7$ then we have:

$61+5+3e+8+6+i+35=115+3e+i≡ mod 7$

Let $115+3e+i=21\times 7=$$3e+i=32$$e=9$ and $i=5$

The only number which remains is 6 for g, so one solution can be:

$N=7536291840$

sirous
  • 12,694
  • That is hard to read. The naming of the digits as a,b,c is not very useful, $a_0, a_1,\ldots$ make more sense. Formulas like $61+5d+3e+4f+2h+i+5j≡ mod 7$ have no mathematical meaning. It seems you try to use dots to align values, but one should Latex arrays or similar structures to display this. – miracle173 Oct 27 '18 at 17:01
2

If the digit representation of such number is $ \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 d_0 \rangle$, where $$ \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 d_0 \rangle:=\Sigma_{i=0}^{9}10^id_i$$ then we know that $d_0=0$ because $$10\mid \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 d_0 \rangle.$$

The sum $$d_9 +d_8+ d_7+ d_6+ d_5+ d_4+ d_3+ d_2+ d_1 +0$$ is $$0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45,$$ so $$9 | \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 0\rangle.$$

Because $$8\mid \langle a_2 a_10\rangle.$$ we also know that $$4\mid \langle a_2a_1\rangle \tag{2}$$

So we have $$t\mid \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 0 \rangle, \; \forall t \in \{2,3,4,5,6,8, 9, 10\}$$ if $(2)$ holds.

If $$11\mid \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 d_0 \rangle$$ then for the alternate sum holds
$$11 \mid d_9 +d_8- d_7+ d_6- d_5+ d_4- d_3+ d_2- d_1+0$$

The alternate sum is between $$-9-8-7-6-5+1+2+3+4=35$$ and $$9+8+7+6-1-2-3-4-5=30.$$ But we know that the alternate sum is divisible by $11$ and it is the sum of $5$ odd and $5$ even numbers, so it is odd. Therefore the alternate sum is in $ \{-33,-11,11\}.$

How to construct a solution?

  1. Set $a_0=0$
  2. Start with a possible value for $\langle a_2a_1\rangle$ such that

    • $4\mid \langle a_2a_1\rangle$
    • $a_1 \ne a_2$
    • $a_1 \ne 0$
    • $a_2 \ne 0$
  3. The remaining digits $\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}\setminus\{d_1, d_2\}$ partion into two sets, set $\cal{O}=\{d_3, d_5, d_7, d_9\}$ that contains $4$ elements at the odd indexed positions and set $\cal{E}\{d_4, d_6, d_0\}$ that contains the $3$ elements at the even indexed positions.

  4. If $$\Sigma_{d \in \cal{E}}-\Sigma_{d \in \cal{O}}+a_2-a_1 \in \{-33,-11,11\} \tag{1}$$ we are done, otherwise select an element $\cal{e} \in \cal{E}$ and $\cal{o} \in \cal{O}$, remove $\cal{e}$ from $ \cal{E}$ and $\cal{o}$ from $ \cal{O}$ and add $\cal{e}$ to $ \cal{O}$ and $\cal{o}$ to$ \cal{E}.$ The left hand side of $(1)$ is incremented by $2(\cal{o}-\cal{e}).$ Repeat this step until $(1)$ is satisfied or if you are bored.
  5. If $(1)$ holds then assign the elements of $ \cal{O}$ to $d_9, d_7, d_5, d_3$ in an arbitrary way and assign the elements of $ \cal{E}$ to $a_8, a_6, a_4$ also in an arbitrary way. Now $$t\mid \langle d_9 d_8 d_7 d_6 d_5 d_4 d_3 d_2 d_1 0 \rangle, \; \forall t \in \{2,3,4,5,6,8, 9, 10,11\}$$ holds.

Example:

The smallest valid value for $\langle a_2 a_1 \rangle$ is $12.$ The values $00, 04, 08, 20$ are not valid because they contain $d_0.$ The numbers $44$ and $88$ are not valid because $d_2=d_1$, so the number cannot be a permutation.

So $d_1=6$ and $d_2=1$, we set $ \cal{O}=\{2,3,4,5\}$ and $ \cal{E}=\{7,8,9\}$. The left hand side of $(1)$ is $-14+24+1-6=-5.$ Now we shift $7$ to $\cal{O}$ and $4$ to $\cal{E}.$ This decreases the LHS of $(1)$ by $6$ to $-11$ and we are done. So we have $$\cal{O}=\{2,3,5,7\}$$ $$\cal{E}=\{4,8,9\}$$ $$\langle d_2 d_1 d_0 \rangle =160 $$ and can construct the number $$ 2435879160$$ $\square$

We can generate $4!\cdot 3!=144$ different numbers from our sets $\cal{O}$ and $\cal{E}.$ There is a good chance that about $\frac{1}{7}$ of these 144 numbers are divisible by $7$, these are about $20$ numbers. If there is no such number we can construct other numbers by repeating steps 2 to 5.

Here number $ 2435879160$ is already divisible by $7.$

miracle173
  • 11,359
1

We just need a number divisible by $5,7,8,9,11$ and everything else is automatic. Divisibility by $9$ isn't a concern, as the digits already sum to $45$ and $9\mid45$. The number must end with $0$ since it's even and divisible by $5$. The last three digits must be divisible by $8$, so they're some multiple of $040$ (of course $040$ isn't actually a valid candidate, since it repeats $0$ twice). Divisibility by $11$ means the alternating sum of the digits must be a multiple of $11$. Divisibility by $7$ means the first $9$ digits is a multiple of $7$. Now, I think the most efficient method is to write a program taking into account all of these parameters to find a numerical answer.

YiFan Tey
  • 17,740
  • 4
  • 30
  • 73
  • I don't think that one should use a program to solve this problem. – miracle173 Oct 27 '18 at 16:24
  • @miracle173 Well, I guess that is the easy way out. Since I posted my answer sirous and you have posted pen-and-paper solutions, but of course it's quite tedious. – YiFan Tey Oct 27 '18 at 16:26
0

COMMENT.- It is clear that the required number, $N$, must be a multiple of $2^3\cdot3^2\cdot5\cdot7\cdot11=27720$ so we must have $N=27720x$ where $x$ is such that $N$ have ten (distinct) digits. It follows after a calculation$ $ that if there is solution then $x$ is an integer such that$$36076\le x\le360750$$ In other words, $x$ is a number belonging to a set of $324675$ integers.

Ataulfo
  • 32,657
-1

The number which are divisible by $8$ is also divisible by $2$ and $4$.

The number which are divisible by $9$ is also divisible by $3$.

The number of which is divisible by $6$ is also divisible by $2$ and $3$.

The number which are divisible by $10$ is also divisible by $2$ and $5$.

Also also the number we expect is divisible by $11$ and $7$.

So the number is in the form $=P×2^{3i}×3^{2j}×5^k×7^m×11^n$, Where $i$, $j$, $k$, $m$, & $n$ are positive any positive integer and $P$ is any positive integer integer.Using this condition we will produce a required ten digit number.

Avinash N
  • 1,191
  • 2
    This is not correct. You need something in the form of $k \times 2^3 \times 3^2 \times 5 \times 7 \times 11$. What you have is only a subset (and a quite restrictive one of that) of the numbers that fulfill the divisibility criteria described. – Jean-Luc Bouchot Oct 27 '18 at 02:38
  • @Jean-LucBouchot yes Sir. Absolutely. I forget to include this. Anyhow Thanks much. – Avinash N Oct 27 '18 at 02:45
  • Why did I get downvote? Then mentioned me where the mistake occurs. It will help me to correct myself. Thank you. – Avinash N Oct 27 '18 at 05:38
  • I voted this down. @Jean-LucBouchot already showed you what was wrong. And it is still wrong. e,g 1695711 is not contained in your set. And even if you replace it by Jean's correct formula, how does this answer the question? How do you use this formula to create such a number or to proof that such a number does not exist? – miracle173 Oct 27 '18 at 06:11
  • @miracle173 oh yes. There is a mistake. Thanks much. Any help to fix this issue? It is greatly appreciated... – Avinash N Oct 27 '18 at 12:00