0

If $a_n < b_n$ for all $n$, then $\lim a_n \leq \lim b_n$.

I'm not sure how to prove this. In particular, why is there "$\leq$" in the limits?

3 Answers3

4

If $a_n < b_n$ then $c_n=b_n-a_n>0$ for all $n$, therefore $$\lim c_n\geq0$$ otherwise let $\lim c_n=\ell<0$, there exists $N$ such that for $n\geq N$ $$|c_n-\ell|<\ell/2$$ and $c_N<\frac32\ell<0$ contradict with $c_n>0$ for all $n$.

Nosrati
  • 30,522
1

To give a proof of this I would personally go for a contradiction:

Assume that $\lim a_n > \lim b_n$, let $\epsilon = \lim a_n - \lim b_n$ ans consider a $N$ such that $|a_N-\lim a_n|<\epsilon/3$ and $|b_N-\lim b_n|<\epsilon/3$ (it exists because of the definition of the limit). Then find a contradiction with $a_N<b_N$.

As for the equality The example given in the comment by Blue is a good example.

wece
  • 2,932
0

If $a_n < b_n$ then the largest value of $a_n$ is smaller than the smallest value of $b_n$. But since these sequences are infinite, we express this in terms of $\sup$ and $\inf$, namely:

$$\sup \{a_n \} \leq \inf \{ b_n \}$$

and hence it follows that for the limit superior and limit inferior we have

$$\limsup \{a_n\} \leq \liminf \{b_n\}$$

Since $\lim \{x_n\}$ is defined as being the $x$ such that $\liminf \{x_n\} = \limsup \{x_n\} = x$ the result follows.

If this is confusing to you, I'd recommend reading the Wikipedia page.

To answer your second question why an equality is necessary, consider what happens if $b_n$ converges to $x$ from above, while $a_n$ converges to $x$ from below.

Xiaomi
  • 1,798