I understand what an ordered pair is, but I'm having trouble the formal Kuratowski definition which says that $\langle a,b \rangle = \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}$. What about this definition imposes order on the pair?
-
2Can you write out $\langle 1, 2 \rangle$ and $\langle 2, 1\rangle$? – Calvin Lin Jan 25 '13 at 03:30
-
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but no, it's an ordered pair because it can only be written $\langle a,b \rangle$. – user58437 Jan 25 '13 at 03:31
-
If any of the answeres below were useful to you, then you should upvote all answers you find useful and accept the one that was most useful to you. It is a way to show that you have found the answer to your question and it shows your appreciation. Now it seems like you still need help. If answers are not useful to you, then it helps if you say why not. This helps others to help you. For more information read this. – gebruiker Apr 07 '16 at 10:14
3 Answers
The Kuratoiwski definition intends to enforce the one basic notion of an ordered pair, that is $$\langle a,b\rangle=\langle c,d\rangle\iff a=c\land b=d.$$ While one direction is trivial, note that $$\begin{align}&\langle a,b\rangle=\langle c,d\rangle\\ \implies&\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}=\{\{c\},\{c,d\}\}\\ \implies&\{a\}\in\{\{c\},\{c,d\}\}\\ \implies&\{a\}=\{c\}\lor\{a\}=\{c,d\}\\ \implies&a=c\lor a=c=d\\ \implies&a=c\\ \end{align}$$ and then $$\begin{align}&\langle a,b\rangle=\langle a,d\rangle\\ \implies&\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}=\{\{a\},\{a,d\}\}\\ \implies&\{a,b\}\in\{\{a\},\{a,d\}\}\\ \implies&\{a,b\}=\{a\}\lor \{a,b\}=\{a,d\}\\ \implies& b\in\{a\}\lor b\in\{a,d\}\\ \implies & b=a\lor b=d \end{align}$$ and by symmetry also $d=a\lor d=b$. Combined, this yields $(b=a\land d=a)\lor b=d$, i.e. $b=d$. In summary, $$\langle a,b\rangle=\langle c,d\rangle\implies a=c\land b=d.$$
- 382,479
-
1Rather than thinking about this formally, from which little intuition can be gained, it may be better to see that an ordered pair is coding an order, by listing its initial segments: $\emptyset,{a},{a,b}$ are the initial segments of the order on the set ${a,b}$ where $a$ comes first. Clearly, we do not need to list $\emptyset$, and this list obviously tells us what the elements are, and which one comes first (and the case $a=b$ is coded here as well). – Andrés E. Caicedo Jan 27 '13 at 23:49
Notice: $\langle a,b \rangle = \big\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\big\}$, but $\langle b,a \rangle = \big\{\{b\},\{a,b\}\big\}$. The first elements of these sets are different.
-
I guess that's part of my question- why would < b,a, > be written {{b}, {b,a}}? Since the latter isn't ordered, couldn't you reorganize it to say {{a,b},{b}}? – user58437 Jan 25 '13 at 03:33
-
1
It implies $\langle b,a\rangle=\{{\{{b\}},\{{a,b\}}\}}$, so $\langle a,b\rangle\neq\langle b,a\rangle$.
- 185,413
-
-
-
-
-
-
That’s why I said may. Out of curiosity, which does come more naturally for you now? If I’m not mistaken, you’ve been down there for a good long time now. – Brian M. Scott Jan 25 '13 at 23:10
-