4

There is a triangle ABC. Equation of AB is $x + y = 2$, Equation of AC is $2x + 3y = 5$ and Equation of BC is $5x - y = 7$.

Given above, how do I find the equation of median $AD$ without finding any vertices of triangle ABC?

  • Why is there even a need to look for some alternative method when you have so easy, less time consuming method because solving linear equations in two variables won't take more than 1-2 minutes and rather there is nothing left to do much after doing so. – Rohan Shinde Mar 11 '18 at 09:26
  • It is a question given in the textbook. Maybe the teacher/textbook wants us to learn an alternative method. – user2409011 Mar 11 '18 at 09:29
  • @user2409011: What topic has the textbook covered that applies to this exercise? I can imagine some fairly convoluted ways to proceed, but, so far, nothing that's as straightforward as calculating the vertices and going from there. ($A$, in particular, is easy to determine by inspection. $B$ and $C$ aren't very difficult.) – Blue Mar 11 '18 at 09:38
  • @Blue Chapter is Straight Lines where various ways of calculating equations like using vertices, using slope-intercept, normal form (xcosalpha + ysinalpha = p) etc. are explained. I feel that by calculating angles of this triangle, we can find the equation but unable to solve it yet. – user2409011 Mar 11 '18 at 09:42
  • @Blue Convoluted method will also do if cant think of anything else. Please do let me know. – user2409011 Mar 11 '18 at 09:43

4 Answers4

2

It is easy to check that if points $B$ and $C$ had the same $x$ coordinate, then the slope of median $AD$ would be the average of the slopes of lines $AB$ and $AC$: $$ m_{AD}={y_D-y_A\over x_D-x_A}={(y_B+y_C)/2-y_A\over x_D-x_A} ={1\over2}{y_B-y_A\over x_B-x_A}+{1\over2}{y_C-y_A\over x_C-x_A} ={1\over2}(m_{AB}+m_{AC}). $$

As $m_{BC}=5$, we can have line $BC$ parallel to the $y$-axis if we perform a counterclockwise rotation of an angle $\phi={\pi\over2}-\arctan5=\arctan{1\over5}$. Under such a rotation, the slope $m=\tan\theta$ of a generic line becomes $m'=\tan(\theta+\phi)$, that is: $$ m'={m+1/5\over 1-m/5}. $$ It is then easy to compute the slopes of lines $AB$ and $AC$ after the rotation: $$ m'_{AB}=-{2\over3},\quad m'_{AC}=-{7\over 17}, $$ and then find the slope of median $AD$ after the rotation: $$ m'_{AD}={1\over2}(m'_{AB}+m'_{AC})=-{55\over102}. $$ We can then rotate back by the same angle to find $m_{AD}$: $$ m_{AD}={m'_{AD}-1/5\over 1+m'_{AD}/5}=-{29\over35}. $$ To find the equation of line $AD$ we can then consider a linear combination of the equations of lines $AB$ and $AC$: $$ \alpha(x+y-2)+\beta(2x+3y-5)=0. $$ Such an equation represents the pencil of all lines passing through $A$ and we just have to choose now coefficients $\alpha$ and $\beta$ such that the slope of the corresponding line is $m_{AD}$. This leads to the equation $$ -{\alpha+2\beta\over\alpha+3\beta}=-{29\over35}, \quad\hbox{that is}\quad {\alpha\over\beta}={17\over6}, $$ which can be satisfied for instance by $\alpha=17$ and $\beta=6$. Substituting these values into the above equation finally gives the equation of line $AD$: $$ 29x+35y-64=0. $$

2

I'd first considered something along the lines of @Aretino's slope-averaging argument. Since that's been done, I'll use an area-halving argument. Write $$\begin{align} \overleftrightarrow{BC}: &\quad h_1 x+k_1y+p_1=0 \\ \overleftrightarrow{CA}: &\quad h_2 x+k_2y+p_2=0 \\ \overleftrightarrow{AB}: &\quad h_3 x+k_3y+p_3=0 \end{align} \tag{1}$$

The equation of the median through $A$ must be a combination of the other lines through $A$, say, $$\overleftrightarrow{AD}=m\overleftrightarrow{AB}+\overleftrightarrow{CA}: \quad (h_2+m h_3)x+(k_2+mk_3)y+(p_2+mp_3) = 0 \tag{2}$$

Now, we'll refer to a nifty formula, first brought to my attention in this question, that gives the area of a triangle from the equations of its edge-lines. (This might be out-of-scope for OP's class, but, as @G-man mentioned in that question, the formula deserves greater familiarity, so I'm doing my part to promote it.)

$$|\triangle ABC| = \frac{\left|\begin{array}{ccc} h_1 & k_1 & p_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 & p_2 \\ h_3 & k_3 & p_3 \end{array}\right|^2}{2 \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_1 & k_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2 & k_2 \\ h_3 & k_3 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_3 & k_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|} \tag{$\star$}$$

Technically, the area is the absolute value of the expression above, but we can assume that the lines are ordered appropriately so as to give a non-negative result. In writing an expression for $\triangle ADC$, with $D$ the midpoint of $\overline{BC}$, we need to make sure that the bounding lines are ordered in the same way; namely, $\overleftrightarrow{DC}$ (that is, $\overleftrightarrow{BC}$), $\overleftrightarrow{CA}$, and $\overleftrightarrow{AD}$, we also have $$|\triangle ADC| = \frac{\left|\begin{array}{ccc} h_1 & k_1 & p_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 & p_2 \\ h_2+mh_3 & k_2+mk_3 & p_2+mp_3 \end{array}\right|^2}{2 \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_1 & k_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2 & k_2 \\ h_2+mh_3 & k_2+mk_3 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2+m h_3 & k_2+mk_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|} \tag{3}$$ Recall that determinants are unchanged if we replace a row by a linear combination of that row with another. Also, we can "factor-out" a common factor in a row. Thus, $$\begin{align}|\triangle ADC| &= \frac{\left|\begin{array}{ccc} h_1 & k_1 & p_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 & p_2 \\ mh_3 & mk_3 & mp_3 \end{array}\right|^2}{2 \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_1 & k_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2 & k_2 \\ mh_3 & mk_3 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2+m h_3 & k_2+mk_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|} \\ &= \frac{m\left|\begin{array}{ccc} h_1 & k_1 & p_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 & p_2 \\ h_3 & k_3 & p_3 \end{array}\right|^2}{2 \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_1 & k_1 \\ h_2 & k_2 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2 & k_2 \\ h_3 & k_3 \end{array}\right| \left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2+m h_3 & k_2+mk_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|} \end{align} \tag{4}$$ Notice that the expressions for $|\triangle ABC|$ and $|\triangle ADC|$ have a lot in common, and that we can write $$\frac{|\triangle ADC|}{|\triangle ABC|} = \frac{m\left|\begin{array}{cc} h_3 & k_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|}{\left|\begin{array}{cc} h_2+mh_3 & k_2+mk_3 \\ h_1 & k_1 \end{array}\right|} = \frac{m(h_3 k_1 - h_1k_3)}{h_2k_1-h_1k_2+m(h_3k_1-h_1 k_3)} \tag{5}$$ Finally, we invoke the fact that a median bisects a triangle's area: the ratio in $(5)$ is $1/2$, which tells us

$$m = \frac{h_1 k_2-h_2 k_1}{h_1k_3-h_3 k_1} \tag{$\star\star$}$$

For the problem at hand, $m = 17/6$, so that

$$\overleftrightarrow{AD}: \quad 29x + 35 y - 64 = 0$$

as in @Aretino's solution. $\square$


Note. As in that other answer, assuming our original equations are in normal form provides a geometric insight; namely $$m = \frac{\sin C}{\sin B}$$ so that $$\overleftrightarrow{AD} \;=\; \overleftrightarrow{AB}_{\text{n}}\;\sin C + \overleftrightarrow{AC}_{\text{n}}\;\sin B$$ where "n" indicates that we're to use the normal form in the calculation. (The resulting equation will not necessarily be in normal form.) Nifty!

Blue
  • 83,939
0

1) Draw two parallels $B_1C_1$ and $B_2C_2$ to the line $BC: 5x-y=7$, for example $y=5x-10$ and $y=5x-\dfrac{25}{2}$.

2) calculate the intersections of $B_1C_1$ with the lines $AB$ and $AC$ and do the same with the line $B_2C_2$ so you get four points $B_1,C_1,B_2,C_2$

3) You have now two points of the required median which are $P=\dfrac{B_1+C_1}{2}$ and $Q=\dfrac{B_2+C_2}{2}$

enter image description here

Calculation gives $$B_1=(2,0),C_1=(\dfrac{35}{17},\dfrac{5}{17}),B_2=(\dfrac{29}{12},\dfrac{-5}{12}),C_2=(\dfrac52,0)\\P=(\frac{69}{34},\frac{5}{34}),Q=(\frac{59}{24},\frac{-5}{24})$$ Thus the equation $$\color{red}{29x+35y=64}$$

Ataulfo
  • 32,657
0

Equation of AB is $x + y = 2$, equation of AC is $2x + 3y = 5$

Cheating somewhat, it is obvious by inspection that both lines pass through $\,(1,1)\,$. Then, choosing a complex plane with the origin at $\,(1,1)\,$, the conditions can be written (with $\,\lambda, \mu, \nu \in \mathbb{R}\,$) as:

$$ \begin{align} b &= \lambda (1-i) \\ c &= \mu (3-2i) \\ b - c &= \nu (1+5i) \end{align} $$

The latter equation implies $\,\lambda (1-i) - \mu (3-2i) = \nu (1+5i) \iff \begin{cases}\lambda - 3 \mu = \nu \\ -\lambda+ 2 \mu = 5 \nu \end{cases}\,$. Eliminating $\,\nu\,$ between the two gives $\,-\lambda+2\mu=5(\lambda-3\mu) \iff6 \lambda = 17 \mu\,$. It follows that:

$$ 2d = b+c = \lambda (1-i) + \mu (3-2i) = \frac{\mu}{6}\big(17(1-i)+6(3-2i)\big) = \frac{\mu}{6} (35-29i) $$

Therefore, the median line is $\,z = (35-29i)\,t \,\mid\, t \in \mathbb{R}\,$. Translating back to cartesian:

$$ x-1 + (y-1)i = 35 t -29 t\,i \iff \begin{cases} x-1 = 35 t \\y - 1 = -29 t\end{cases}$$

Eliminating $\,t\,$ between the last two equations gives in the end $\,29x+35y-64=0\,$.

dxiv
  • 77,867