5

Farey sequence of order $n+1$ ($F_{n+1}$) can be construct by adding mediant value (${a+c \over b+d}$) into $F_{n}$, where ${a \over b}$ and ${c \over d}$ are consecutive term in $F_{n}$, and $b+d = n+1$.

I've already prove that

  • ${a \over b} < {a+c \over b+d} < {c \over d}$
  • $b+d$ always irreducible in ${a+c \over b+d}$.
  • the middle of any 3 consecutive term in any $F_{n}$ are mediant.
  • Number of new elements added is $\phi(n+1)$.

Now I wonder does the construction by mediant value coverage all elements in $F_{n+1}$. It's easy to show that ${1 \over n+1}$ and ${n \over n+1}$ does involve in it, but I have no idea how to show that other ${m \over n+a}$, where $gcd(m, n+1) = 1$, are going to be constructed.

Please give me a hint.

neizod
  • 194

2 Answers2

3

Given $0\le r\lt s$ and $\gcd(r,s)=1$, you want to show that $r/s$ shows up as a mediant. We argue by induction on $s$. Since $\gcd(r,s)=1$, there are integers $x,y$ with $$rx-sy=1$$ and $x\lt s$, $y\lt r$. By the induction hypothesis, $y/x$ and $(r-y)/(s-x)$ have already turned up in the Farey sequence, and their mediant is $r/s$.

Gerry Myerson
  • 185,413
  • Don’t you also need to show that $y/x$ and $(r−y)/(s−x)$ are adjacent in the previous Farey sequence. Otherwise, their mediant $r/s$ would not turn up in the construction of the next Farey sequence. – Wrzlprmft Oct 18 '14 at 21:42
  • Good point. I think it shouldn't be hard to show that those two fractions are so close together that there can't be one between them with denominator less than $s$. – Gerry Myerson Oct 18 '14 at 22:02
  • Having spent some time on trying to proof this and failed, I do not consider it that easy. But then again, I am not good in number theory and may have missed something trivial. – Wrzlprmft Oct 26 '14 at 08:34
  • 1
    Note that I placed a bounty on this question for filling this gap. – Wrzlprmft Oct 28 '14 at 12:19
3

The gap in Gerry Myerson's proof can be filled easily indeed. It is easy to show by induction that $ad-bc=1$ for any two adjacent fractions $\frac{a}{b} > \frac{c}{d}$in any $F_n$. The key property is then that if $\frac{a}{b} >\frac{p}{q} > \frac{c}{d}$ with $a,b,c,d,p,q>0$, $ad-bc=1$, then $q\geq b+d$.

In fact, this last property has already been explained (by me) in an older MSE question : see here.

Community
  • 1
Ewan Delanoy
  • 63,436