I was reading from an old maths textbook. It was giving some examples on how to solve ratios. I stumbled upon this example and felt perplexed after reading only part of it.
We're given this equation.
$$\frac{x}{l(mb+nc-la)} = \frac{y}{m(nc+la-mb)} = \frac{z}{n(la + mb - nc)}$$
And asked to prove that
$$\frac{l}{x(by + cz - ax)} = \frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)} = \frac{n}{z(ax + by -cz)}$$
He starts by doing this:
$$\frac{\frac{x}{l}}{mb + nc - la} = \frac{\frac{y}{m}}{nc + la - mb} = \frac{\frac{z}{n}}{la + mb -nc}$$
Which I understand. Then, he goes on to say this:
We have $$\frac{\frac{x}{l}}{mb + nc - la} = \frac{\frac{y}{m}}{nc + la - mb} = \frac{\frac{z}{n}}{la + mb -nc}$$
$$= \frac{\frac{y}{m} + \frac{z}{n}}{2la}$$ These are similar expressions. $$\therefore \frac{ny + mz}{a} = \frac{lz + nx}{b} = \frac{mx + ly}{c}$$
This is the portion of the proof that I don't understand. How did he go from $= \frac{\frac{y}{m} + \frac{z}{n}}{2la}$ to $\frac{ny + mz}{a} = \frac{lz + nx}{b} = \frac{mx + ly}{c}$? And, also, what does he mean by these are "similar expressions."
The textbook I'm reading is called Higher Algebra a Sequel to Elementary Algebra for Schools by Henry Sinclair and Samuel Ratcliff Knight.
Thanks for the help.