Consider the differential equation
$$u_{t t} = c^2 u_{x x} - k u, \qquad k, u > 0$$
together with the Cauchy data
$$u(x, 0) = e^x, u_t(x, 0) = 0$$
I now want to find a solution $u: \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R$ for this equation which is real-analytic with respect to $t$.
Now I was given the tip that I might construct the desired solution $u$ via Taylor expansion in a point $(x, 0)$ (with respect to $t$) and see what comes out for the first few Taylor coefficients, and then prove a formula for all of them per induction. (And afterwards of course check that it actually solves the equation, but I think that will be the easier matter.)
Therefore, I started this way: let's say we write the desired solution $u$ in its Taylor expansion $u(x, t) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{u^{(n)}}{n!} t^n$ around $(x, 0)$. Then because of the Cauchy data, we would immediately have $u^{(0)} = u(x, 0) = e^x$ and $u^{(1)} = u_t(x, 0) = 0$. Putting that into our equation, we get $u^{(2)} = u_{t t}(x, 0) = c^2 e^x - k e^x = (c^2 - k) e^x$ I think. So we got the first few coefficients already.
But that's where my wisdom ends... how would I be able to get the rest of the coefficients? I don't even know how I can get the third one.
In other words, if I have the coefficients $u^{(0)}, \dots, u^{(n)}$ of the Taylor series expansion of the desired solution, how can I deduce the $n+1$-the one using only the given PDE and Cauchy data? As for a general formula for them, it would seem plausible that each $u^{(n)}$ is a product of $e^x$ and some constant term, given what the first few look like, but I'm not sure how I can actually prove that.