9

An identity of the Bell numbers is given by $$B_n=\frac{1}{e}\sum_{x=1}^\infty \frac{x^n}{x!}$$ and I was wondering if it would be valid to define fractional Bell numbers in the same way, to preserve this identity. So, to calculate what I would take as $B_{1/2}$, I would have to calculate $$\frac{1}{e}\sum_{x=1}^\infty \frac{\sqrt x}{x!}$$ However, I have no idea how to calculate this sum, and I am afraid that it may not have a closed form.

Can somebody show me how to evaluate this, or a better way to define fractional Bell numbers?

NOTE: I am thinking that perhaps I can express $$\frac{\sqrt x}{x!}$$ in the form $$\int_a^b f(x,n)\,dn$$ for some $a$, $b$, $f$, so that I can convert my sum into an integral. Any ideas how to do this?

Michael Hardy
  • 1
Franklin Pezzuti Dyer
  • 40,930
  • 9
  • 80
  • 174
  • 5
    if there is an integral representation probably it can be extended by analytic continuation. Try to see for what values of $w$ this integral make sense $$B_w = \frac{\Gamma(w+1)}{2 \pi i e} \int_{\gamma} \frac{e^{e^z}}{z^{w+1}} , dz. $$ –  Jul 24 '17 at 18:34
  • 1
    searching for "generalized Bell numbers" I found some proposals (not sure if equivalent or different). In particular this paper seems interesting by it geometrical interpretation. I will add also this paper that seems interesting because it is an understandable extension of the Bell numbers. –  Jul 24 '17 at 19:00
  • 1
    the extension of Bell Numbers to complex arguments through the integral cited by Masacroso is well discussed in this article – G Cab Aug 02 '17 at 15:48
  • I studied generalized Bell-numbers as an exercise for myself. Maybe you like http://go.helms-net.de/math/binomial_new/04_5_SummingBellStirling.pdf – Gottfried Helms Oct 15 '17 at 10:08

0 Answers0