3

Let $X\in \mathbb R^m$ be J-measurable set and $f:X\to \mathbb R$ an integrable function. I would like to prove this Riemann sum formula still holds

$$\int _Xf(x)dx=\lim_{|D|\to 0}\Sigma(f;D^*)$$

even we take only the sets of the decomposition $D^*$ which don't have common points with the boundary of $X$.

Remarks:

We define the Riemann sum as $\Sigma (f;D^*)=\sum_{i=1}^kf(\xi_i)volX_i$, where the decomposition $D^*=\{X_1,\ldots,X_k\}$ and $X_i$ are J-measurable with $\xi_i\in X_i$.

I want to prove if we restrict to only the $X_i$ without any point in commum with the boundary of $X$, then we can use only these sets in the Riemann sum getting the same result as if we would sum every $X_i$.

I can see this intuitively, but I don't know how we can prove it formally.

Math1000
  • 38,041
user42912
  • 24,130

2 Answers2

4

Let $R$ be a rectangle such that $X \subset R$. Since $X$ is $J-$measurable, the boundary $\partial X$ has measure zero. The integral over $X$ is given by

$$\int_X f = \int_R f \,1_{X}$$

where the$1_X$ denotes the indicator function.

$$1_X(x) = \begin{cases}1, \,\,\,\, x \in X,\\ 0, \,\,\,\, x \notin X \end{cases}.$$

Since $f \, 1_X = f \, 1_{X \setminus \partial X}$ except possibly on the measure zero set $\partial X$, we have

$$\tag{1}\int_X f = \int_R f 1_X = \int_R f 1_{X \setminus \partial X}.$$

Now consider Riemann sums for the integral on the right-hand side of (1). If a sub-rectangle of a partition $P$ intersects the boundary, choose a point on the boundary $\partial X$ as the intermediate point where the integrand $f \, 1_{X \setminus \partial X}$ is evaluated. Since the integrand has $0$ value at this point, there will be no contribution to the sum from sub-rectangles that intersect the boundary. However, as $|P| \to 0$ such Riemann sums converge to the integral on the right-hand side of (1) and consequently to the integral on the left-hand side.

To arrive at (1) we use the fact that if $h = f-g = 0$ except on a set $E$ of measure $0$, then $\int_R h = \int_R(f-g) = \int_R f - \int_R g = 0.$ This is relatively easy prove even in the context of Riemann integration. Given any partition P of $R$, every sub-rectangle $S$ has non-zero content and must contain a point $x$ where $h(x) = 0$. Hence, upper and lower Riemann sums satisfy

$$L(P,h) \leqslant 0 \leqslant U(P,h) $$

and

$$\int_R h = \sup_P L(P,h) \leqslant 0 \leqslant \inf_P U(P,h) = \int_R h \\ \implies \int_R h = 0$$

RRL
  • 92,835
  • 7
  • 70
  • 142
  • Great answer, thank you very much! – user42912 Jan 27 '17 at 20:24
  • @user42912: You're welcome. Nice question -- as you said it seems obvious since the boundary has $0$ measure, but it is not so obvious how it plays out in the limiting process for Riemann sums. – RRL Jan 27 '17 at 20:51
0

I'd like to give another proof of OP's exercise which uses a very useful lemma that often comes in handy when bounding sums involving sets that are close to a set with zero volume. Here is the lemma:

Lemma. Let $X, Y \subset \mathbb{R}^{m} $ be $ J $-measurable sets and $ \operatorname{vol} Y = 0 $. For every $ \varepsilon > 0 $ there exists $ \delta > 0 $ such that, for every decomposition $ D = \{X_1, \ldots, X_k\} $ of $ X $ into $ J $-measurable sets with $ |D| < \delta $, we have $$ \sum_{d(X_i, Y) < \delta} \operatorname{vol} X_i < \varepsilon. $$

The proof is straightforward, so I will omit it here. Now we can apply that to our problem. Since $ m(\partial X) = 0 $ (as $X$ is $ J $-measurable), and because $\partial X$ is also compact, we have $ \operatorname{vol} \partial X = 0 $. Furthermore, if $ X_i \cap \partial X \neq \varnothing $, then $ d(X_i, \partial X) < \delta $ for every $ \delta > 0 $. From the lemma above, there exists $ \delta > 0$ such that for any decomposition $ D = \{X_1, \ldots, X_k\} $ of $X$ with $ |D| < \delta $ we have $$ \left|\sum_{X_i \cap \partial X \neq \varnothing} f(\eta_i) \operatorname{vol} X_i \right| \leq K \sum_{d(X_i, \partial X) < \delta} \operatorname{vol} X_i < K \varepsilon, $$ where $ K $ denotes the maximum value of $|f|$. This demonstrates that the contributions to the Riemann sum from terms intersecting $ \partial X $ approach zero and thus become negligible.

huh
  • 1,017