2

The starting point of this question is the following theorem.

Theorem (4.10 in Rudin's) Every nonempty, closed, convex set $E$ in a Hilbert space $H$ contains a unique element of smallest norm.

Consider $(C([0,1], \mathbb{K}), \Vert \cdot \Vert_\infty)$. Let

$$A = \left\{f \in C([0,1]) \text{ such that } \int_{0}^\frac{1}{2} f(t)\, dt - \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^{1} f(t)\, dt= 1\right\}$$

Consider $L^1([0,1])$. Let $$B = \left\{f \in L^1([0,1]) \text{ such that } \int_{0}^1 f(t)\, dt = 1\right\}$$

$A$ and $B$ are nonempty.

  1. How can I prove that $A$ is convex and closed but has no element of smallest norm?

  2. How can I prove that $B$ is convex and closed but has infinitely many elements of smallest norm?

Maman
  • 3,478

2 Answers2

2

Hint: In the case of $A$, any function in $A$ trying to minimize its norm must try very hard to look like $$\begin{cases}\frac12&0\le t<\frac12,\\-\frac12&\frac12\le t\le1.\end{cases}$$ However, that is not continuous. In other words, show that the infimum of norms of elements of $A$ is $\frac12$, but that infimum is not achieved.

For $B$, use the triangle inequality to show that $\|f\|\ge1$ for all $f\in B$. But if $f\ge0$, that becomes an equality. There will be lots of nonnegative functions with $\int_0^1 f(t)\,dt=1$!

In both cases, proving convexity and closedness should be straightforward.

Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • 32,608
  • 2
  • 61
  • 87
  • Very helpful! Thanks a lot! I'll let you know if I find difficulties in formalizing the details of A. –  Dec 04 '16 at 23:05
0

Convexity means that if $f$ and $g$ are element of your sets then $tf+(1-t)g$ is also in your set for $t\in[0;1]$. Just apply this definition and you'll seee that $A$ and $B$ are convex.

For closedness you can write each set as $\phi^{-1}(\{0\})$ with a well choosen, continuous $\phi$.

Now to show that $A$ has no element of smalest norm : take some $f$ in $A$ and find $g\in A$ such that $\|f\|>\|g\|$.

For $B$ one have $f\in B \Rightarrow \|f\|_1\geq 1$, can you find an infinity of distincts functions $f$ such that $\int_0^1 fd \lambda = 1$ and $\|f\|_1=1$ ?

Renart
  • 3,046
  • Alright, I checked convexity; and closedness by studying the limit of convergent sequences. But what $\phi$'s did you have in mind? –  Dec 04 '16 at 22:58
  • Your approach to problem A seems very clean, could you add some details on how you would carry it out? –  Dec 04 '16 at 23:09