Let me present a proof of the first special case (product of $k$
distinct primes) by @martin, which is a nice result that can be proved
by Polya enumeration.
I will assume the reader has consulted and understood the material at
the following
MSE link
which I will not duplicate here.
Using the notation from the link with $q$ being the number of factors
in the partition we obtain by the Polya Enumeration Theorem the
following formula:
$$G(k, q) = \left[\prod_p X_p\right]
Z(P_q)\left(\prod_p (1+X_p)\right)
\quad\text{where}\quad n=\prod_p p^v$$
with all $v=1$ and we have $k$ distinct primes in the product. Here
the square bracket denotes coefficient extraction of formal power
series and $Z(P_q)$ is the cycle index of the set operator
$\def\textsc#1{\dosc#1\csod} \def\dosc#1#2\csod{{\rm #1{\small #2}}}\textsc{SET}_{=q}$ which was also used in the linked-to computation from above.
Now recall the OGF of the set operator which is
$$Z(P_q) = [z^q]
\exp\left(a_1 z - a_2 \frac{z^2}{2}
+ a_3 \frac{z^3}{3}
- a_4 \frac{z^4}{4}
+\cdots \right).$$
Observe that on substituting into the cycle index we let
$$a_m = \prod_p (1+X_p^m).$$
But the degree of $X_p$ in the coefficient being extracted is one,
which means that from the $a_m$ with $m\ge 2$ only the constant term
contributes, which is one.
This gives the formula
$$G(k, q) = \left[\prod_p X_p\right] [z^q]
\exp\left(z\prod_p (1+X_p)
- \frac{z^2}{2} + \frac{z^3}{3} - \frac{z^4}{4} + \cdots\right)$$
which is
$$G(k, q) = \left[\prod_p X_p\right] [z^q]
\exp\left(z\left(-1+\prod_p (1+X_p)\right) + \log(1+z)\right)
\\ = \left[\prod_p X_p\right] [z^q] (1+z)
\exp\left(z\left(-1+\prod_p (1+X_p)\right)\right)
\\ = \left[\prod_p X_p\right]
\left(\frac{1}{q!} \left(-1+\prod_p (1+X_p)\right)^q
+ \frac{1}{(q-1)!} \left(-1+\prod_p (1+X_p)\right)^{q-1}\right).$$
Doing coefficient extraction on the first term
we find
$$\left[\prod_p X_p\right]
\frac{1}{q!} \sum_{m=0}^q {q\choose m} (-1)^{q-m}
\prod_p (1+X_p)^m.$$
Only the terms with $X_p$ raised to the power one contribute
and we get for the first term
$$\frac{1}{q!} \sum_{m=0}^q {q\choose m} (-1)^{q-m} m^k
= {k\brace q}.$$
The second term is similar and therefore the answer to the special
case of a product of $k$ primes is
$${k\brace q} + {k\brace q-1}.$$
Now that we have this we can easily give a combinatorial
interpretation. The first term represents the case where we divide the
$k$ prime factors into $q$ non-empty sets which correspond to the $q$
distinct factors of the multiplicative partition with none of the
factors being one. (With the $k$ primes being distinct the products of
the elements of these sets are necessarily distinct.) This almost
completes the count except we have not accounted for partitions
containing one as a factor. That leaves $q-1$ distinct factors to
choose according to the same procedure as before, done.
Remark. Using the OGF of the Stirling numbers of the second kind
which is
$${n\brace k} = [z^n] \prod_{r=1}^k \frac{z}{1-rz}$$
we get the generating function
$$\prod_{r=1}^q \frac{z}{1-rz}+
\prod_{r=1}^{q-1} \frac{z}{1-rz}
= \left(1+\frac{z}{1-qz}\right) \prod_{r=1}^{q-1} \frac{z}{1-rz}
\\ = \frac{1-(q-1)z}{1-qz} \prod_{r=1}^{q-1} \frac{z}{1-rz}.$$