3

If a series converges absolutely, then any sub-series also converges absolutely.

1) is it true? 2) is there a simple "one line" argument to prove it?

zesy
  • 2,693
  • 17
  • 35

2 Answers2

7

If the “subseries” has general term $(a_{n_k})$, then for the $k$-th partial sum of the subseries we have $$ \sum_{i=0}^k|a_{n_i}|\le\sum_{i=0}^{n_k}|a_i|\le\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}|a_i| $$

egreg
  • 244,946
3

Hint. The answer is yes, since for any sub series $\sum u_{\phi(n)}$, you may write $$ \sum\left| u_{\phi(n)}\right|\leq \sum\left| u_{n}\right|. $$

Olivier Oloa
  • 122,789
  • This is unclear to me; what are the bounds of the sums? If they're infinite, this is circular, and if they're finite, it would seem to hinge on $u_n$ being decreasing, which is not necessarily true. – Milo Brandt Mar 28 '15 at 20:26
  • @Meelo Let's take it as finite sums. If the RHS converges, then the LHS converges (the partial sum is increasing and bounded): this gives an answer the question in the title. – Olivier Oloa Mar 28 '15 at 20:55