1

I have following language $L:= \{a^n b^n c^m \mid n \neq m; n,m \ge 0 \}$ and would like to use proof by contradiction by applying Pumping Lemma for CFLs to show that $L$ is not a CFL.

In any case, i need to choose $w = uv^iwx^iy$ so that $w \in L$.

I tried $a^p b^p c^{p+1}$ , $a^p b^p c^{p+p!}$ ($p$ - Pumping Length) and couple of others. All of my proofs converged to 5 cases:

  1. Only A (both $v$ and $x$ pump $a$'s),
  2. A & B ($v$ pumps $a$'s, $x$ pumps $b$'s),
  3. Only B (both - $b$'s),
  4. B & C ($v$ - $b$'s, $x$ - $c$'s),
  5. Only C (both - $c$'s).

Cases #1-#4 are not a problem, but in #5 $w \in L$ regardless $i$ chosen (cause condition is not broken). Thus, how do i choose the word here?

This page hints to take p!-Trick, but it doesn't work here..?

Hendrik Jan
  • 31,459
  • 1
  • 54
  • 109
Max Azatian
  • 13
  • 4

1 Answers1

1

Your analysis is correct. In order to keep the $a^n b^n c^m$ structure of the string, the only ways to pump are case (2) pump both $a$'s and $b$'s, or case (5) pump only $c$'s. All other case will distroy the structure of the string.

You applied the $p!+p$-trick, and consider the string $a^p b^p c^{p!+p}$. In case (2) this will indeed pump to a string of the form $a^{p!+p} b^{p!+p} c^{p!+p}$ outside of the language because all segments are of equal length. No luck in case (5), you are right.

The solution is to apply Ogden's Lemma. The Lemma is like the common Pumping Lemma for CF languages where we count so called "marked" positions in a word. By marking the $a$'s in the string one is forced to pump $a$'s, so only case (2) applies.

Apart from a mirror-like symmetry this is explained in the application for inherent ambiguity of Ogden in wikipedia.

Hendrik Jan
  • 31,459
  • 1
  • 54
  • 109