Questions tagged [significant-figures]

This tag contains various questions relating to the "significant figures" or "significant digits" etc. etc. Significant figures or significant digits are the digits which give us useful information about the accuracy of a measurement.

The term significant figures refers to the number of important single digits ($0$ through $9$ inclusive) in the coefficient of an expression in scientific notation .

The number of significant figures in an expression indicates the confidence or precision with which an engineer or scientist states a quantity.

  • The first significant figure of a number is the first digit which is not zero. Hence the first significant figure of $20,499$ is $2$ and the first significant figure of $0.0020499$ is $2$.

  • The second significant figure of a number is the digit after the first significant figure. This is true even if the digit is zero. Hence the second significant figure of $20,499$ is $0$, as is the second significant figure of $0.0020499$.

  • The third significant figure of a number is the digit after the second significant figure. This is true even if the digit is zero, and so on. Hence the third significant figure of $20,499$ is $4$ and the fourth is $9$, as are the third and fourth significant figures of $0.0020499$.

We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places. We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit. We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros. This is because we need them to hold the correct place value for the significant digits.

For example, $20,499$ to three significant figures is $20,500$. We round up because the first figure we cut off is $9$. $\quad 0.0020499$ to three significant figures is $0.00205$. We do not put any extra zeros in to the right after the decimal point. This is because we do not need them to hold the correct place value for the significant digits.

If the last significant digit of a number is $0$, we include this. For example, $0.0020499$ to two significant figures is $0.0020$. The first significant digit is $2$, the second significant digit is $0$. The next digit is $4$, so we round down.

In any calculation, the number of significant figures in the solution must be equal to, or less than, the number of significant figures in the least precise expression or element.

Consider the following product:

$$2.56 \times 10^{67} \times (-8.33) \times 10^{-54}$$

To obtain the product of these two numbers, the coefficients are multiplied, and the powers of $10$ are added. This produces the following result:

$$2.56 \times (-8.33) \times 10^{{67}+(-54)}$$ $$= 2.56 \times (-8.33) \times 10^{67-54}$$ $$= -21.3248 \times 10^{13}$$

The proper form of common scientific notation requires that the absolute value of the coefficient be larger than $1$ and less than $10$. Thus, the coefficient in the above expression should be divided by $10$ and the power of $10$ increased by one, giving:

$$-2.13248 \times 10^{14}$$

Because both multiplicands in the original product are specified to only three significant figures, a scientist or engineer will round off the final expression to three significant figures as well, yielding:

$$-2.13 \times 10^{14}$$

as the product.

Reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_figures

87 questions
6
votes
1 answer

Should we, or when should we use exception to the number of significant figures?

For example, if we need an answer that is precise to 4 significant figures. Or, let's say it is the standard procedure to use 4 significant figures in a department in a company. Say, if the probability of failure is 0.02441%, if we write it as the…
4
votes
2 answers

Significant figures when measuring to nearest 5-minute of a day

Let's say I'm measuring the weight of a potted plant about once a day. I want to record when I measure it to the nearest $5$-minute (i.e. if I measure at $7:33$, then I would record $7:35$). Let's use these data points for an example: Timepoint 1:…
Snoober
  • 43
4
votes
3 answers

How do I denote only some zeros as significant

I want to write 45,000 with some numbers of significant figures. It's really easy to write it with 2 significant figures: 45,000 5 significant figures is also easy: 45,000. 6 and up is also easy: 45,000.0 But how do I write it with 3 or 4…
4
votes
3 answers

Does significant figures make sense for percentages?

If I ask for a percentage with 2 significant figures, I mean something like $62\%$ or $77\%,$, with no decimals. But what about percentages below $10\%?$ Do I write them like $5.6\%$ just because with no decimals they would be one digit? What about…
4
votes
2 answers

If a number is being rounded to 2 decimal places, should the third decimal place be rounded by the fourth first?

I came across this number: 3.96146 It needs to be rounded to three decimal places. Should it be 3.961 or 3.962 if it is considered that the fifth decimal place rounds up the fourth one which in turn rounds up the third one?
3
votes
2 answers

How was the rule about sigfig multiplication derived?

The rules of sigfigs say that when adding/subtracting, the sum/difference is rounded to the least precise measurement. $$32.56 + 2.0592 = 34.6192$$ Rounded answer: $34.62$ The rules also say that when multiplying/dividing, the product/quotient is…
3
votes
2 answers

What is the area of a rectangle that has a reported height of 7.5 cm and length of 10.5 cm? (There's more to this question than meets the eye!)

Question: Report the area of a rectangle that has a reported height of 7.5 cm and length of 10.5 cm. According to an HMH Algebra 1 textbook, the product of two [reported] measurements should have no more significant digits than the least precise…
3
votes
2 answers

General approach to finding number of significant figures in mixed operations

There are ways to doing operations with significant figures, but not really for mixed operations. I have looked all over the Internet, Stack Exchange, and the textbook I use. I'm surprised, but in any case, I would like a general approach for…
Alex
  • 41
3
votes
2 answers

Standard deviation sig figs

Let's say I calculated a mean to be 2.475, but the data values had the least significant figure in the tenths place (i.e. 2.6, 2.8 etc.) so I round the mean value to 2.5 for correct sig figs. However, my standard deviation is 0.0835, and choosing my…
John
  • 31
3
votes
1 answer

How do significant digits work with angles?

The angle 355 degrees gives us the same point on the unit circle as the angle -5 degrees. But one of these has three significant digits, the other has just one. (Relatedly, an absolute error of half a degree would yield a different relative error.)…
Elin
  • 31
3
votes
3 answers

Why do we order our numbers from most significant digit and not the least significant?

Not sure if this belongs here, but it occurred to me that when I add two numbers, I start adding them from the left to the right. Probably because of the simple fact that I read from left to right, or maybe because it feels natural to repeat myself…
3
votes
1 answer

Expression Comes Out with a Different Number of Significant Figures When Simplified Differently

How many significant figures are in 6.0*5.0 - 6.0*4.0? Let's multiply first: 6.0 * 5.0 - 6.0 * 4.0 (6.0 * 5.0) - (6.0 * 4.0) (30.) - (24) 6 The final answer comes out to have one significant figure because the last step involves subtraction in…
2
votes
1 answer

Is there a standard function that has this kind of precision-behavior?

I would like to know if there is a well-known function that behaves in a manner best illustrated with reference to the following (completely hypothetical) weighing machine. The weighing machine has a super-extended digital display stretching left…
CrimsonDark
  • 241
  • 1
  • 8
2
votes
0 answers

finding magnitude of the error in input that results in the most loss of significant error

so I am currently working on a homework problem. The goal is to find with a given matrix (where $\delta=2^{-17}$)$$ {\bf A}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & \delta & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & \delta^2…
2
votes
1 answer

How do I avoid significant rounding error in evaluating $(\ln(x) - \sin(\pi x))(1-x)^{-1}$?

How do I avoid significant rounding error in evaluating $$\frac{\ln(x) - \sin(\pi x) }{1-x}$$ This function causes error as $x\to 1$. How can this be avoided? I tried using taylor's expansion but I am not getting a nice closed form. Please help
1
2 3 4 5 6