Questions tagged [semi-riemannian-geometry]

It is the study of smooth manifolds equipped with a non-degenerate metric tensor, not necessarily positive-definite (and hence a generalisation of [riemannian-geometry]). Included in this are metric tensors with index 1, called "Lorentzian", which are used to model spacetimes in (general-relativity).

A semi-Riemannian manifold is a pair $(M,g)$ where $M$ is a smooth manifold and $g$ a section (usually assumed smooth, but continuous or perhaps even lower regularity are sometimes considered) of $T^{0,2}M$ (in other words, $g$ is a covariant two-tensor field), such that $g$ satisfies the conditions:

  1. $g(X,Y) = g(Y,X)$ for any vector fields $X,Y$. (Symmetric)
  2. $g(X,\cdot)$, as a one-form, is the zero-one form if and only if $X$ is the zero vector. (Non-degenerate)

If in addition $g(X,X) > 0$ when $X \neq 0$, we say that the geometry is Riemannian.

While much of the algebraic theory of Riemannian geometry (by which I mean the curvature identities, Gauss-Codazzi equations, and other statements that are obtained by purely algebraic manipulations of the definitions) can be reproduced identically for semi-Riemannian geometry, there are crucial differences. For example, the theorem of Hopf-Rinow on geodesic completeness is no longer true. (Roughly speaking, the reason is that in the proof of Hopf-Rinow it is used the fact that in Riemannian geometry, the set of vectors $g(X,X) = 1$ is topologically a sphere, and is compact. In semi-Riemannian geometry, the corresponding set can be non-compact.)

Much of the study of semi-Riemannian geometry focuses on clarifying which statements of Riemannian geometry have appropriate analogues.

Now, since $g$ is continuous, from Sylvester's law of inertia we have that the metric signature of $g$ is constant on every connected component of $M$. The case where the signature is (-++...+) deserves special mention, as this is the setting in which one studies . This case is often called Lorentzian geometry.

In the Lorentzian case we have some more tools available to us compared to the general semi-Riemannian manifolds. The most important difference being that the set $\{g(X,X) < 0\}$ in $T_pM$ has two connected components. In more general semi-Riemannian settings the analogue set is connected. This property allows us to locally determine a notion of future and past, which leads to the development of causal geometry, which carries a fundamental role in the study of mathematical relativity.

460 questions
26
votes
1 answer

Interpreting the scalar curvature in a semi-Riemannian manifold

Background: Let $M$ be a smooth Riemannian manifold of dimension $n$ and scalar curvature $R$ (with respect to the Levi-Civita connection). Let $m \in M$ and let $B$ be the geodesic ball of radius $r$ centered at $m$. That is, $B = \{ Exp_m(v)\ |\…
17
votes
5 answers

Gathering books on Lorentzian Geometry

I find it very hard to find books on Lorentzian Geometry, more focused on the geometry behind it, instead of books that go for the physics and General Relativity approach. More specifically, I'm talking about the Lorentzian manifolds and…
12
votes
1 answer

Variation of a differential form

Physicists sometimes get the lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}\mbox dA \wedge \star \mbox dA - A \wedge \star J$$ define a functional given by $$S(A)=\int_{N_4} \mathcal{L}= \int_{N_4}-\frac{1}{2}\mbox dA \wedge \star \mbox dA - A \wedge \star…
12
votes
1 answer

Gram-Schmidt process in Minkowski space $\Bbb L^n$.

I'm trying to prove a version of Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process in Minkowski space $\Bbb L^n$ (for concreteness, I'll put the sign last). I am not interested in the existence of orthonormal bases, but instead in the algorithm. Namely,…
11
votes
1 answer

Manifolds that admit Lorentzian metrics?

John Lee says in "Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature": With some more sophisticated tools from algebraic topology, it can be shown that every noncompact connected smooth manifold admits a Lorentz metric, and a compact connected…
11
votes
2 answers

Definition of gradient of a function $f$ in Riemannian manifold

I'm reading Semi Riemannian Geometry with applications to relativity by Barret Oneill and I'm trying understand the definition of gradient of a function $f$ in Riemannian Manifold. I know that motivation for define the gradient of a function $f$ in…
11
votes
2 answers

How are the pseudo-Riemannian metric tensor properties restricted by the manifold topology in pseudo-Riemannian manifolds?

My understanding is that a pseudo-Riemannian metric tensor induces a topology that is not compatible with the manifold topology, and obviously the manifold topology prevails if we are to have a manifold like in this case. But then it is hard not to…
9
votes
1 answer

Helices in Lorentz-Minkowski space $\Bbb L^3$.

Context: Consider the Lorentz-Minkowski space $\Bbb L^3$, with the metric: $$ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 - dz^2$$ (which I'll denote just by $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$) If $\alpha$ is spacelike and ${\bf N}(s)$ is lightlike for all $s \in I$, the Frenet…
9
votes
1 answer

Justifying "determinant" of second fundamental form using the definition of sectional curvature

Question: if $M\subseteq \widetilde{M}$ is a non-degenerate hypersurface in a pseudo-Riemannian manifold $M$, then is it true that $$\langle X, \widetilde{\nabla}_XN\rangle =\langle Y, \widetilde{\nabla}_YN\rangle $$for all $X,Y$ tangent to $M$,…
9
votes
0 answers

Could you explain the failure of the Hodge decomposition to exist for non-compact manifolds?

I'm a physicist and the mathematics around the Hodge Decomposition is way formal than I can currently follow (I'm trying to better myself but it'll take a while). Specifically what I'm (pragmatically) interested in is the existence of some…
8
votes
1 answer

When do isometries commute with the compatible derivative operator on a semi-Riemannian manifold?

Let $M$ and $\tilde{M}$ be smooth manifolds, each with a metric $g_{ab}$ and $\tilde{g}_{ab}$, assumed here to be smooth symmetric invertible tensor fields, which are non-degenerate but not necessarily positive-definite. Let $\nabla_a$ be the…
8
votes
2 answers

Is time-orientability a condition on the metric, smooth or topological structure of a manifold?

I recently asked a question on Physics Stack Exchange about orientability and time-orientability of a manifold in the language of fiber bundles. This new question is related to, but independent, of that one. Orientability of an $n$-dimensional…
8
votes
2 answers

Finding local orthonormal frame on a Pseudo-Riemannian Manifold

Suppose we have a semi-Riemannian manifold $(M^n,g)$ with metric signature $(n-k,k)$. By definition, each $p \in M$ the map $g_p : T_pM \times T_pM \to \Bbb{R}$ is a non-degenerate, symmetric, bilinear form. How to find a local orthonormal frame…
7
votes
2 answers

No Lorentzian metric on $S^{2}$

In the book Riemannian Geometry by Gallot et al there is a remark at the beginning that there is no Lorentzian metric on $S^{2}$. Is it a difficult theorem? Or there is an easy solution? Any hint/idea how to prove this?
Bingo
  • 1,814
7
votes
1 answer

Is there an analogue of the moduli space of the torus in semi-Riemannian signature?

I'm starting to study Riemann surfaces and already met the fact that Riemann surfaces have both a complex structure and a conformal structure that are, in fact, very closely related. If we consider a Riemann surface one can classify the different…
1
2 3
30 31