Questions tagged [ricci-flow]

The Ricci flow on a Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ is determined by the geometric evolution equation $\partial_t g_{ij} = -2R_{ij}$ where $R_{ij}$ is the Ricci curvature. The Ricci flow is the main ingredient in Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture.

The Ricci flow is a type of geometric flow (gradient flow associated to a functional on a manifold) that deform the metric of a Riemannian manifold.

For a metric tensor $g_{ij}$ and Ricci tensor $R_{ij}$, the Ricci flow is defined by the geometric evolution equation \begin{equation*} \partial_t g_{ij}=-2R_{ij}. \end{equation*}

On a $3$-dimensional manifold, Perelman demonstrated how you can get past singularities that Ricci flow produces using surgery on the manifold

296 questions
21
votes
2 answers

Reversing the Ricci flow

Suppose $S$ is a closed, oriented surface (2-manifold) embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, which inherits the metric from $\mathbb{R}^3$, so that distances are measured by shortest paths on the surface. If it is at least crudely accurate to say that Ricci…
20
votes
3 answers

Intuitive interpretation of Ricci Flow

What is the best way to interpret, explain or somehow visualize the basic idea behind formal definition of Ricci Flow? I am familiar with the hackneyed expressions like "Ricci Flow is a non-linear analogue for the heat equation which smoothens…
18
votes
0 answers

The invariance of the Ricci tensor under diffeomorphisms and its non-ellipticity.

Consider $(M,g)$ a compact Riemannian manifold. When viewed as a second order (non-linear) differential operator $$ \text{Ric} : C^{\infty}(\text{Sym}^2_+T^*M) \to C^{\infty}(\text{Sym}^2T^*M), $$ the Ricci operator (taking a metric $g$ to its Ricci…
13
votes
1 answer

What does "smooth solution" of Ricci flow mean?

A way to formalize smoothness of a flow is to think of the spacetime, see e.g. here. Let's say we are flowing a compact manifold $M$. Which of the following is true? $g_{ij}$ is a $C^1$ in time and $C^\infty$ in the space coordinate. $g_{ij}$ is…
12
votes
1 answer

The Ricci flow and $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}g_{ij}=-2(R_{ij}+\nabla_i \nabla_j f)$ are equivalent up to diffeomorphism

Suppose $M$ is a Riemannian manifold. Consider flow $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}g_{ij}=-2(R_{ij}+\nabla_i \nabla_j f)$, where $f$ is a time-dependent function. I would like to prove that flows of this form are equivalent, up to diffeomorphism, to…
11
votes
1 answer

Ellipticity of Ricci tensor, does it depend on coordinates?

Well, I am afraid this is a silly question because I know the answer must be 'yes, it does'. But I don't see why. I put the problem in context. The ricci tensor can be regarded as a differential operator acting of metrics (it is an expression that…
11
votes
2 answers

Ricci curvature: step in proof of a paper by Hamilton

In Hamilton's paper "The Ricci Curvature Equation" (in Seminar on Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, here), I can do all of Lemma 4.2 except for the following relation: $$ -g^{ik}g^{j\ell}h_{pk}\partial_jF^p_{i\ell}=-\frac{1}{2}\Delta…
11
votes
1 answer

Cigar soliton solution

In wikipedia, it has been written that an important 2-dimensional example of Ricci flow over $M=\mathbb{R}^2$ is given by $g((x,y),t)=\frac{dx^2+dy^2}{e^{4t}+x^2+y^2} \;\;\; (\star) $ Here are my questions; I. Why the family $(\star)$ satisfies…
10
votes
0 answers

Where does the $2$ in Ricci flow come from?

I started learning about Ricci flow recently, which is always given as $$ \frac{\partial g}{\partial t}=-2\textrm{Ric}. $$ It would seem more natural to me to define Ricci flow instead by the equation $$ \frac{\partial g}{\partial…
10
votes
2 answers

Problem about Ricci flow

On page 12 of "Lectures On Ricci Flow" by Peter Topping is written: In two dimensions, we know that the Ricci curvature can be written in terms of the Gauss curvature $K$ as $Ric(g) = Kg$. Working directly from the equation $\frac{\partial…
10
votes
1 answer

Ricci Flow: PDE details?

Over the past few weeks I have been reading 'Ricci flow: An introduction' (Chow and Knopf) which is, in my opinion, a very well written and quick introduction to the topic. However I find that the book focusses mainly on geometric aspects (which I…
10
votes
1 answer

How to prove the holonomy group is preserved under Ricci flow?

I've heard that on a Kähler manifold $(M,g_0)$, if you evolve the metric $g$ by Ricci flow $\partial g_{ij}(t)/\partial t=-2R_{ij}$, and $g(0)=g_0$, then you always have $g(t)$ is a Kähler metric on $M$. All the references I saw refer this fact to…
8
votes
1 answer

Reference about the surgery of Ricci flow

I roughly read the Topping's LECTURES ON THE RICCI FLOW. There does not seem to be an introduction on surgery. Seemly, it is enough to deal singularity by blow up. Then, in order to know surgery, I read the Perelman's Ricci flow with surgery on…
8
votes
0 answers

Maple Code for Ricci Flow

I am trying to generate a Maple Simulation for Ricci Flow assuming general Solids of Revolution and such. I assume that there is a surface with the following parametrization: $$S:\left\{\begin{matrix}x=R(z,t)\cos\theta \\y=R(z,t)\sin\theta\\…
7
votes
2 answers

How to show $\partial_t \hat g = \sigma'(t)\psi_t^* (g) + \sigma(t) \psi_t^*(\partial_t g) + \sigma(t) \psi_t^*(L_Xg)$?

$X(t)$ is a time dependent family of smooth vector fields on $M$, and $\psi_t$ is the local flow of $X(t)$, namely for any smooth $f:M\rightarrow R$ $$ X(\psi_t(y),t) f = \frac{\partial(f\circ \psi_t)}{\partial t} (y) $$ Let $$ \hat g(t) =\sigma(t)…
Enhao Lan
  • 6,682
1
2 3
19 20