Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3174 questions
106
votes
6 answers

Why isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation?

An equivalence relation is defined by three properties: reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity. Doesn't symmetry and transitivity implies reflexivity? Consider the following argument. For any $a$ and $b$, $a R b$ implies $b R a$ by symmetry. Using…
44
votes
14 answers

Why do we care about equivalence relations?

I understand that equivalence relations can group elements of a set to a class that share similar properties. I think it's really cool that we can partition a set using equivalence relations. I'm also someone who doesn't do math for its applications…
Qi Zhu
  • 9,413
43
votes
2 answers

Definition of "quotient set"

I searched and searched about quotient set and cannot figure out what it is. At the beginning, I thought it was the same as partitions, but now I'm confused. Can someone show some examples and explain?
PlayMa256
  • 751
39
votes
8 answers

Why is the Frobenius norm of a matrix greater than or equal to the spectral norm?

How can one prove that $ \|A\|_2 \le \|A\|_F $ without using $ \|A\|_2^2 := \lambda_{\max}(A^TA) $? It makes sense that the $2$-norm would be less than or equal to the Frobenius norm but I don't know how to prove it. I do know: $$\|A\|_2 =…
31
votes
9 answers

How to think about a quotient sets modulo an equivalence relation, and well-defined functions on the quotient set.

Perhaps there is not a correct way to think about it but I would want to know how others think about it. Here are my problems/questions, after my definitions: Definition 1. Let $X$ be a set and $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$. Then…
24
votes
4 answers

Understanding equivalence class, equivalence relation, partition

I'm having difficulty grasping a couple of set theory concepts, specifically concepts dealing with relations. Here are the ones I'm having trouble with and their definitions. 1) The collection of equivalence classes w.r.t. $R$ Def: Let $R$ be an…
17
votes
6 answers

Determine the number of equivalence relations on the set {1, 2, 3, 4}

this was a question listed on my last "proofs and conjectures" midterm. It is similar to my previous post however this asks a different question which is throwing me off. What is the number of equivalence relations on the set $\{1, 2, 3,…
user122661
  • 1,011
17
votes
3 answers

When are algebraic expressions equivalent?

This question arose when I was going to determine the domain for $f \circ f(x)$. Let $f(x) = \dfrac{1-x}{1+x}$. $f \circ f(x) = x, \quad$ But the domain is not $\mathbb{R}$ because $f(x)$ is undefined for $x = -1$. This made sense to me after some…
16
votes
2 answers

Examples of sets which are not obviously sets

In my (limited) experience, it is usually easy to see when something is large enough to be a proper class, by constructing an element of the class for every set. However, sometimes such a proper class has lots of redundant information, so we…
16
votes
4 answers

What does it mean when I say that addition/multiplication for an equivalence relation is well defined?

I have trouble understanding this concept. Why is it necessary to prove that addition or multiplication is well defined in equivalence classes? My understanding of equivalence classes is that it must be reflexive, symmetric and transitive. Doesn't…
14
votes
2 answers

Is the quotient map a homotopy equivalence?

It is well known that, if $A \subset X$ is a reasonable contractible subspace, then the quotient map $X \to X/A$ is a homotopy equivalence ("reasonable" means that the pair $(X,A)$ has the homotopy extension property, e.g. if it is a CW pair). For…
14
votes
1 answer

What is the empty relation?

I was reading the Wikipedia article on equivalence relations and one section says that "the empty relation $R$ on a non-empty set $X$ is vacuosly symmetric and transitive but not reflexive." What is the empty relation? And what is vacuosly…
Gabu
  • 317
14
votes
1 answer

What do you get with this equivalence relationship for all $\mathbb{Q}$ sequences

Consider all $\mathbb{Q}$ Cauchy sequences with this equivalence relationship $\{x_n\} \sim \{y_n\} \iff \{x_n-y_n\} \rightarrow 0$ Then you get all real numbers as an equivalence class with this relationship. Let's consider now all $\mathbb{Q}$…
13
votes
11 answers

Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?

Relations defined by formulas such as " x has the same age as y" , " x comes from the same country as y " " a has the same image under function f as b " are obviously equivalence relations, due to the presence of the expression " same ... as". Are…
1
2 3
99 100