It seems likely that your result can be proven using methods like those used to bound the number of exceptions to the Goldbach conjecture. Let $E(x)$ be the number of even integers $\le x$ that cannot be written as a sum of two primes. It is known that $E(x) \in O(x^{1-\delta})$ for some $\delta>0$ (for instance, see references here). (That is, the number of exceptions, if there are any, grows relatively slowly.) Therefore, given a set $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}_{\text{even}}$ that is sufficiently dense (e.g., such that the number of its elements $\le x$ grows much faster than $x^{1-\delta}$), we can guarantee that some member of $A$ is a Goldbach number. In your case, let $A=\{p+q : q {\text{ is an odd prime}}\}$. This is a sufficiently dense set of even numbers: by the prime number theorem, the number of primes grows faster than $x^{1-\delta}$ for any $\delta>0$. So we have this:
For any odd composite integer $p$, there exist primes $q,p',q'$ such that $p+q=p'+q'$.
But to prove your statement when $p$ is prime, we need some member of $A$ to have not one but two distinct Goldbach partitions. Let $E_2(x)$ be the number of even integers $\le x$ that cannot be written as a sum of two distinct pairs of primes. (The only known exceptions are $6$, $8$, and $12$.) A proof that $E_2(x)\in O(x^{1-\delta})$ for some $\delta>0$ would imply your statement. Since the required bound is so weak, and the analogous result for $E(x)$ is long-known, it is plausible that this bound could be proven as well.