6

Problem: Given an odd prime number $p$, are there odd prime numbers $q$, $p'$, $q'$ such that $\{p,q\} \neq \{ p',q'\}$ and $p+q = p'+q'$ ?

This comment informs that it's an obvious corollary of the Polignac's conjecture.
This conjecture is still open, and my problem seems much weaker, so that I ask for a proof.

Sebastien Palcoux
  • 6,097
  • 1
  • 17
  • 46

2 Answers2

2

Let $p$ be an odd prime and $q$ the next prime. We want to search in the natural numbers for a prime $p'$ such that $q'=p'+(q-p)$ is also a prime. If we find this $p'$ then we get

$p+q'=p'+q$.

This is probably easier to solve, but a temporary observation is that this would follow immediately from Polignac's conjecture.

Asinomás
  • 107,565
1

It seems likely that your result can be proven using methods like those used to bound the number of exceptions to the Goldbach conjecture. Let $E(x)$ be the number of even integers $\le x$ that cannot be written as a sum of two primes. It is known that $E(x) \in O(x^{1-\delta})$ for some $\delta>0$ (for instance, see references here). (That is, the number of exceptions, if there are any, grows relatively slowly.) Therefore, given a set $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}_{\text{even}}$ that is sufficiently dense (e.g., such that the number of its elements $\le x$ grows much faster than $x^{1-\delta}$), we can guarantee that some member of $A$ is a Goldbach number. In your case, let $A=\{p+q : q {\text{ is an odd prime}}\}$. This is a sufficiently dense set of even numbers: by the prime number theorem, the number of primes grows faster than $x^{1-\delta}$ for any $\delta>0$. So we have this:

For any odd composite integer $p$, there exist primes $q,p',q'$ such that $p+q=p'+q'$.

But to prove your statement when $p$ is prime, we need some member of $A$ to have not one but two distinct Goldbach partitions. Let $E_2(x)$ be the number of even integers $\le x$ that cannot be written as a sum of two distinct pairs of primes. (The only known exceptions are $6$, $8$, and $12$.) A proof that $E_2(x)\in O(x^{1-\delta})$ for some $\delta>0$ would imply your statement. Since the required bound is so weak, and the analogous result for $E(x)$ is long-known, it is plausible that this bound could be proven as well.

mjqxxxx
  • 43,344