Where does the choice of the Greek letter $\lambda$ in the name of “lambda calculus” come from? Why isn't it, for example, “rho calculus”?
4 Answers
The symbol “λ” is used for one of two basic constructions in the system introduced by Alonzo Church, specifically abstraction. The notation did not just happen to be chosen but was to distinguish it from another construction by Whitehead and Russell represented as “xˆ.” For his new system, Church initially used “∧x,” then replaced it to “λx” to ease printing, obviously, interpreting the former logical symbol as the capital Greek letter “Λ.”
See “History of λ-calculus and Combinatory Logic” by J. R. Hindley, F. Cardone (Handbook of the History of Logic, 5: 723–817, Elsevier, 2009).
-
1
-
3
-
By why is it a calculus? It has nothing to do with infinitesimal change. – Jordan Mar 22 '18 at 15:23
-
2A calculus is simply a formal, mechanical system for calculation. The word "calculus" literally means "stone" — imagine someone using stones to calculate, abacus-style. So differential calculus is a formal system for calculating derivatives, and integral calculus is a system for calculating integrals. – andru Dec 10 '18 at 21:57
I heard that Church originally used the hat symbol above the bounded variable, like $\hat x.x$, in handwritten papers. Then, the notation became ^x.x because of old-fashioned typewriters. I think it first became $\Lambda x.x$ when more recent text processors appeared, and $\lambda x.x$ after that (for aesthetics reasons probably).
Thanks to the silent downvoter, I did some googling and found Barendregt version in “The Impact of the Lambda Calculus in Logic and Computer Science”:
We end this introduction by telling what seems to be the story how the letter 'λ' was chosen to denote function abstraction. In [100] Principia Mathematica the notation for the function $f$ with $f(x) = 2x + 1$ is $2 \hat x + 1$. Church originally intended to use the notation $\hat x.2x + 1$. The typesetter could not position the hat on top of the $x$ and placed it in front of it, resulting in $\wedge x.2x + 1$. Then another typesetter changed it into $\lambda x.2x + 1$.
- 990
-
1The reference [100] belongs to Whitehead and Russell, not Church. The “History of λ-calculus and Combinatory Logic” paper distinguishes these two constructions, saying explicitly that Church had to introduce another notation. – Sep 16 '11 at 05:14
-
Indeed, meta-lambda abstraction is denoted another way, and is not the same as that of the system by Church. – Sep 16 '11 at 05:16
-
2That reminds me of a section in Littlewood's "Mathematician's Miscellany" (now available as "Littlewood's Miscellany" and highly recommended) where he wrote of a paper he wrote with Hardy which had this as its last phrase: "where $\sigma$ must be made as small as possible." The phrase did not appear in the paper, but, upon examination with a magnifying glass, there was an extremely small "$\sigma$" there. Littlewood wrote that the printer must have scoured London to find such a small $\sigma$. – marty cohen Feb 22 '15 at 06:06
-
1Dana Scott, Church's student, recently specifically debunked this version and asked people to stop spreading it. – Hisham H M Jan 13 '17 at 04:11
Dana Scott, who was a PhD student of Church, addressed this question. He said that, in Church's words, the reasoning was "eeny, meeny, miny, moe" — in other words, an arbitrary choice for no reason. He specifically debunked Barendregt's version in a recent talk at the University of Birmingham.
- 171
-
1The first link seems to be down, and I have a very hard time understanding what Scott is saying in the video due to the sound quality - is there a transcript anywhere? – Nate Eldredge Oct 17 '19 at 00:51
$\lambda$ symbol has (at least) 2 (related) meanings in mathematics (and logic), stemming directly from the ancient greek texts.
Its meaning stems form the fact that is the initial letter of the word ratio (greek: λόγος), meaning both analogy (i.e ratio) and logic (i.e rationality/reasoning)
Presumably this could be the reason Church used that symbol.
Furthermore, there is indeed a $\rho$-calculus which combines (or generalises) $\lambda$-calculus with pattern matching rewritting systems
- 2,326
\\! – leftaroundabout Sep 14 '11 at 18:21