Has SGA 4½ been typeset in TeX?

Question

The title says it all. I've CW'd the question since I'm answering it, as this seemed like the best way to get the news out.

Congratulations on completing this great service to the algebraic geometry community! @user111072, I guess that your reaction is a result of ignorance about SGA 4 1/2 and its importance in modern algebraic geometry, which is proved further by your mistakenly attributing it to Grothendieck. Rest assured, there are plenty who will be very happy to hear about a TeXed version. — , Dec 24 '13 at 15:30

Daniel Miller · Accepted Answer · 2016-11-03T18:00:39.790

26

Yes it has. See the links here. Also here is the Github repo if you would like to modify it or propose improvements.

edited Nov 03 '16 at 18:00

answered Dec 24 '13 at 00:35

Daniel Miller

I heard, anecdotally, that Sophie Morel did this once, for herself. – Ryan Reich Dec 24 '13 at 04:22
You seem to have two versions: sga4.5 and sga4.5-tree. What's the difference? – Georges Elencwajg Sep 18 '14 at 12:20
The correct link for the links is this one. – Pedro A. Castillejo Jun 26 '15 at 12:40
All links above are dead now. In the Wayback Machine, one can find old Daniel Miller's webpage and his old github repo (currently deleted). But sadly the Wayback Machine hasn't archived any link with the pdf file (at least I've been unable to find one). (I wanted to contact Miller to ask him about it, but I cannot find any email address online.) – Elías Guisado Villalgordo Mar 11 '24 at 10:10
1

Good news: Here's a copy of the github repo. Here's a pdf compiled version. – Elías Guisado Villalgordo Mar 11 '24 at 10:12
1

(Archived in the Wayback Machine.) – Elías Guisado Villalgordo Sep 17 '24 at 14:09
Hey @ElíasGuisadoVillalgordo - I've just invited your GitHub alias to the (now private) repo. Springer requested I take it down. Happy to share more context if you start a discussion thread in the repo. – Daniel Miller Sep 22 '24 at 22:38

1 Answers1