25

Let $X$ be any uncountable set with the cofinite topology. Is this space first countable?

I don't think so because it seems that there must be an uncountable number of neighborhoods for each $ x \in X$. But I am not sure if this is true.

Jmaff
  • 1,749

2 Answers2

70

You are correct: it is not first countable. However, this is not because each point of $X$ has uncountably many nbhds: each point of $\Bbb R$ also has uncountably many nbhds, but $\Bbb R$, being a metric space, is certainly first countable.

To prove that $X$ is not first countable, you must show that some point of $X$ does not have a countable local base. All points of $X$ ‘look alike’ in the cofinite topology, so it doesn’t matter what point we pick, so let $x\in X$ be any point. Suppose that $\mathscr{B}=\{B_n:n\in\Bbb N\}$ is a countable local base of open sets at the point $x$, meaning that if $U$ is any open nbhd of $x$, then $x\in B_n\subseteq U$ for some $n\in\Bbb N$. For each $n\in\Bbb N$ let $F_n=X\setminus B_n$: $B_n$ is open, so by definition $F_n$ is finite. Let $F=\{x\}\cup\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}F_n$; $F$ is the union of countably many finite sets, so $F$ is countable. $X$ is uncountable, so there is some $y\in X\setminus F$. Let $U=X\setminus\{y\}$.

  • Is $U$ an open nbhd of $x$?
  • Is there any $n\in\Bbb N$ such that $x\in B_n\subseteq U$?
Brian M. Scott
  • 631,399
  • 1
    I find this proof very interesting and want to confirm if I understand it correctly or not @Brian M. Scott. Like I think $U$ is an open nbhd of $x$ (BUT how to justify this) and for second because $y\in X\setminus F=\bigcap B_n \cup{x}$, hence there must be one $B_n\quad(x\in B_n)\nsubseteq U$. But how these things say about that there is no countable local base for $x$ (a.k.a the contradiction)? – Emon Hossain Sep 13 '21 at 18:00
  • 6
    @emonHR: $U$ is an open nbhd of $x$ because it contains $x$, and its complement, ${y}$, is finite. For every $n\in\Bbb N$ we know that $y\notin F_n$, so $y\in B_n$; and $y\notin U$, so $y\in B_n\setminus U$, and therefore $B_n\nsubseteq U$. In other words, none of the sets $B_n$ is contained in $U$. This is a contradiction: on the one hand $\mathscr{B}$ is supposed to be a countable local base at $x$, but on the other hand $U$ is an open nbhd of $x$ that does not contain any member of the supposed local base $\mathscr{B}$. – Brian M. Scott Sep 14 '21 at 03:51
4

(Just a rewrite of an already excellence answer above and its comment.)

Cofinite topology is not first countable. To prove it, we show that some point of $X$ does not have a countable local base.

Let $x \in X$, and suppose that $\mathscr{B_x}=\{B_n:n\in\Bbb N\}$ is a countable local base of open sets at the point $x$.

For each $n\in\Bbb N$, let $F_n = X \setminus B_n$. $B_n$ is open, so by definition $F_n$ is finite. Let $F = \{x\} \cup \bigcup_{n \in \Bbb N}F_n$; $F$ is the union of countably many finite sets, so $F$ is countable. $X$ is uncountable, so there is some $b\in X\setminus F$ (and $b \neq x$).

Note that if $X$ is not a cofinite topology, then $F$ is not necessarily countable, then $b$ does not necessarily exist.

Let $O = X \setminus \{b\}$. $\{b\}$ is finite, so by definition $O$ is an open set, and it contains $x$ (because of how $b$ defined). For every $n \in \Bbb N$, we know that $b \notin F_n$, so $b \in B_n$, but $b \notin O$, so $b \in B_n \setminus O$, and therefore $B_n \notin O$.

In summary, there is an open set $O$ containing $x$ but not containing $B_n$. This is a contradiction.

We may wonder though what happens if we define $O = X \setminus \{b\}$ in the usual topology. If the local base is an open ball $B(x, \epsilon)$, there would always be $\epsilon < d(x, b)$.

Picture to see things clearer