3

I was reading that you can associate a measure to any given number giving you "how irrational" the given number is. I was wondering is there any irrationality measure that would tell you that the number under consideration is 100 percent irrational.

I guess what I am asking is: Can you establish that any number is irrational purely by looking at its associated irrationality measure?

Also, for numbers whose irrationality is unknown like Pi+e, is anything known about their irrationality measure?

Daniel S.
  • 562
Adam
  • 3,582
  • 2
    If the number's irrationality measure is $\ge 2$, it is irrational. – Daniel R Sep 28 '13 at 17:59
  • Maybe irrationals that are calculable (like Pi and E) could be defined as less irrational than those that are not. I don't even know if there is a proof that some irrationals are not calculable. – ddyer Sep 28 '13 at 18:06
  • 2
    "I was wondering is there any irrationality measure that would tell you that the number under consideration is 100 percent irrational." A number is either irrational, or it isn't. There is no such thing as a number being, say, 73 percent irrational. – Gerry Myerson Sep 29 '13 at 01:18
  • I appreciate the fact, but I was under the impression that there are irrationality measures that can be associated with some irrational numbers and some rational numbers, so one could not look at such a measure and say that, aha this number is 100 percent irrational. – Adam Sep 29 '13 at 14:05

1 Answers1

0

From Wikipedia: Liouville_number, Irrationality_measure:

As a consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem every irrational number has irrationality measure at least 2.

and

Every rational number $\frac{p}{q}$ has an irrationality measure of exactly 1.

So
$x \in \mathbb{Q} \implies \mu(x) = 1$ and
$x \in \mathbb{R} \backslash \mathbb{Q} \implies \mu(x) \geq 2$.

Thus, these are not just implications, but also equivalences, because let's say we know the irrationality measure $\mu(x)$ of some number $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Note that 1 < $\mu(x)$ < 2 can't happen. So if $\mu(x) = 1$, we know that $x$ cannot be irrational, thus it must be rational. And if $\mu(x) \geq 2$, then $x$ cannot be rational, thus it must be irrational. In conclusion we assert that

$x \in \mathbb{Q} \iff \mu(x) = 1$ and
$x \in \mathbb{R} \backslash \mathbb{Q} \iff \mu(x) \geq 2$.

This answers your second question. If we know the interval wherein $\mu(x)$ is, then we directly know if $x$ is rational or irrational, so if we would know, hypothetically, e.g. that $2 \leq \mu(\pi+e) < 1000$, then this would directly tell us that $\pi+e$ is irrational.

Daniel S.
  • 562
  • That 9 years old question seems to be on the level of a beginner in transcendence theory and irrationality measure. This is exactly where I am right now, so I will answer it on my level with the tools available to me, and hence the answer should be very useful for other beginners in this field. – Daniel S. Jul 29 '22 at 10:58