0

Let $f$ be a polynomial in $R[t]$ where $R$ is a ring. Let $\alpha \in R$. Is it true that $t - \alpha$ divides $f$ if and only if $f(\alpha) = 0$?


My thoughts on this matter (which isn't very well-formed yet because I'm still learning this stuff):

I see that this holds good if we substitute the ring $ R $ with field $ K $ then the above holds. I mean we can show that:

For $f \in K[t]$ where $K$ is a field and $\alpha \in K$, it is true that $t - \alpha$ divides $f$ if and only if $f(\alpha) = 0$?

The proof for this is long but at one place the proof depends on the fact that polynomials $ f, g \in K[t] $ ($ g \ne 0 $) can be written uniquely as $ f = qg + r $ such that $ q, r \in K[t] $ and $ deg(r) < deg(g) $.

The proof for this in turn depends on the fact that $ K[t] $ is an integral domain. But this proof does not work when $ R $ is an arbitrary ring (which may not be an integral domain). That leads me to the above question. Does this still hold good for $ R[t] $? If not, is there a counterexample?

Math Learner
  • 1,113
  • What is your thoughts on this problem? – Riemann'sPointyNose Feb 18 '25 at 23:59
  • @Riemann'sPointyNose I see that this holds good if $ R $ is a field (say $ R = K $). The proof is long but at one place the proof depends on the fact that polynomials $ f, g \in K[t] $ ($ g \ne 0 $) can be written uniquely as $ f = qg + r $ such that $ q, r \in K[t] $ and $ deg(r) < deg(g) $. The proof for this in turn depends on the fact that $ K[t] $ is an integral domain. But this proof does not work when $ R $ is an arbitrary ring (which may not be an integral domain). That leads me to the posted question. Does this still hold good for $ R[t] $? If not, is there a counterexample? – Math Learner Feb 19 '25 at 00:05
  • This is a FAQ with many duplicate targets. So the question will be closed. Is your ring commutative? – Martin Brandenburg Feb 19 '25 at 00:19
  • @MartinBrandenburg Thank you! – Math Learner Feb 19 '25 at 00:22

0 Answers0