From basic calculus, we know that if we define a linear function $f(x)=Ax$ with $A\neq 0$ and $x\in R$, then $f(x)$ is automatically continuous in the sense of $\underset{x_n\rightarrow x}{lim} f(x_n)=f(x)$ for any $x$ (and $f(x)$ is also automatically ``bounded'' in the sense of $|f(x)|\leq|A||x|$ for any $x\in R$ ). However, in functional analysis (see the notes at https://uwaterloo.ca/scholar/sites/ca.scholar/files/g6tran/files/amath731_lecture10.pdf), a linear operator (or linear mapping)$L:X\rightarrow Y$ is not necessarily continuous in the sense of $\underset{x_n\rightarrow x}{lim}L(x_n)=L(x)$. Neither is it necessarily bounded in the sense of there exists $c$ such that $||Lx||_Y\leq c||x||_X$ for any $x\in X$. That's why we must first define a bounded linear operator which satisfies $||Lx||_Y\leq c||x||_X$ for any $x\in X$, and then establish its equivalence to continuity of $L$.
My question is, intuitively, as we generalize a linear mapping $f:R\rightarrow R$ to a linear mapping $L:X\rightarrow Y$, what happens so that $L$ is not necessarily bounded (in the sense of $||Lx||_Y\leq c||x||_X$ for any $x\in X$) or continuous?
Some example for linear operator $L$ that is not bounded or not continuous might be helpful. Thanks!