Credits to users Amateur_Algebraist and rschwieb, who gave ideas of the proof in the comments.
I am new to the subject, so this might be overkilling explanation, seems like the it does not follow the standard order of theorem derivations. But this is enough to ensure the positive answer to the question.
Assume $x \neq 0$, then $I \neq 0$. By Wedderburn-Artin theorem
$$
A = \bigoplus_{i=1}^r End(V_i)
$$
where $V_1, \ldots, V_r$ is a complete set of non-isomorphic irreducible representations of $G$. If $n_i = \dim V_i$ then $End(V_i) = M_{n_i}(\mathbb{C})$ is a matrix ring. Moreover, one can decompose matrix ring into minimal left ideals $End(V_i) = \oplus_{j=1}^{n_i} L^{(i)}_{j}$ where $L^{(i)}_j$ are mutually isomporhic.
Then each minimal left ideal $I$ must lie entirely in one of the components, say $End(V_1)$. Since, if $0 \neq y \in I$ then ideal $Ay = I$ (due to minimality of $I$), so if $y$ has something out $End(V_1)$ in direct sum representation, then we may take idempotent $e_1$ that projects onto $End(V_1)$, then $1-e_1$ projects outside (also an idempotent) and we obtain $A(1 - e_1)y \subseteq I$ is an ideal contradicting minimality.
Hence $I = Ax$ is an ideal in a matrix ring $M_n(\mathbb{C})$ for $n = n_1$. The claim is, that $x$ is then rank $1$ matrix of this ring. Indeed, since $x \neq 0$ there is a vector $v \in \mathbb{C}^n$ with $x(v) = u \neq 0$. Take a projector $y$ to the line $\mathbb{C}u$. Then $Ayx \subseteq I$ is an ideal of rank $1$ matrices (since we narrowed to the line) and by minimality $Ayx = I$, hence $I$ consists of rank-$1$ matrices and $x^2 = \mathrm{tr}(x) x$, by this.