Let N be a point process adapted to a filtration $\mathcal{F}_{t}$. The left-continuous intensity process is defined as \begin{equation} \begin{split} \lambda(t|\mathcal{F}_{t})&=\lim_{h\downarrow0}\mathbb{E}\Big[\frac{N(t+h)-N(t)}{h}\Big]\\ &=\lim_{h\downarrow0}\frac{1}{h}\mathbb{P}[N(t+h)-N(t)>0|\mathcal{F}_{t}] \end{split} \end{equation} with \begin{equation} \Lambda(0,t)=\int^{t}_{0}\lambda(s)ds \end{equation} For an inhomogeneous Poisson point process, we have \begin{equation} \mathbb{E}[N(t)]=\Lambda(0,t) \end{equation} however, for a simple Hawkes process with exponential kernel the intensity is stochastic and defined as follows \begin{equation} \lambda(t)=\lambda_{0}+\sum_{t_{i}<t}\alpha\cdot e^{-\beta(t-t_{i})} \end{equation} with $\{t_{1},t_{2},...,t_{n}\}$ the times of past events before time $t$ and $n\in\mathbb{N}$.
Assuming stationarity implies $\mathbb{E}[\lambda(t)]$ is constant and gives in this case (derivation is left out, but it is confirmed in literature that stationarity holds for $\alpha<\beta$) \begin{equation} \mathbb{E}[\lambda(t)]=\frac{\lambda_{0}}{1-\frac{\alpha}{\beta}} \end{equation} Now, I would say that given the dynamics above, the following holds \begin{equation} \mathbb{E}[N(t)]=\mathbb{E}[\lambda(t)]\cdot t=\frac{\lambda_{0}}{1-\frac{\alpha}{\beta}}\cdot t \end{equation} however, I cannot find any literature on this. Furthermore, plotting $N(t)$ together with $\frac{\lambda_{0}}{1-\frac{\alpha}{\beta}}\cdot t$ does confirm my suspicion (unfortunately I am not allowed to insert images yet). Additionally, as the interarrival times should be exponentially distributed (confirmed by literature) a QQ-plot confirms that the simulation is appropriate (good fit up to the 5th quantile). Finally, I am left with two questions:
- Why is $\mathbb{E}[\lambda(t)]$ always constant and can't it be infinitely random or some sort?
- Where does one start with defining $\mathbb{E}[N(t)]$ in case of a simple Hawkes process with exponential kernel?
Thank you