8

Consider a polygonal line $P_0P_1\ldots P_n$ such that $\angle P_0P_1P_2=\angle P_1P_2P_3=\cdots=\angle P_{n-2}P_{n-1}P_{n}$, all measured clockwise. If $P_0P_1>P_1P_2>\cdots>P_{n-1}P_{n}$, $P_0$ and $P_n$ cannot coincide.

While the result is remarkable in itself, the following proof that appears in Titu's 'Mathematical Olympiad Challenges' is just mind blowing :

Let us consider complex coordinates with origin at $P_0$ and let the line $P_0P_1$ be the x-axis. Let $\alpha$ be the angle between any two consecutive segments and let $a_1>a_2>\cdots>a_n$ be the lengths of the segments. If we set $z=e^{i(\pi-\alpha)}$, then the coordinate of $P_n$ is $a_1+a_2z+\cdots+a_n z^{n-1}$. We must prove that this number is not equal to zero.

Using the Abel Summation lemma, we obtain, $$a_1+a_2z+\cdots+a_{n-1}z^n=(a_1-a_2) + (a_2-a_3)(1+z) + \cdots + a_n(1+z+\cdots+z^{n-1})$$

If $\alpha$ is zero, then this quantity is a strictly positive real number, and we are done.

If not, multiply by $(1-z)$ to get $(a_1-a_2)(1-z) + (a_2-a_3)(1-z^2) + \cdots + a_n(1-z^n)$. This expression cannot be zero. Indeed, since $\mid z\mid=1$, by the triangle inequality, we have, $$\mid (a_1-a_2)z + (a_2-a_3)z^2 + \cdots + a_n z^n \mid < (a_1-a_2) + (a_2-a_3) + (a_3-a_4) + \cdots + a_n$$

The conclusion follows.

I was wondering if one can prove this synthetically, without using complex numbers. Any alternate proof or suggestion in the direction of an alternate proof is welcome.

Anubhab
  • 2,078

1 Answers1

2

If the polygon was to return to the origin, then $n\alpha=2\pi$, because the returning line must make an angle of $\alpha$ with the starting line.

Place each edge of the polygon at the origin at an angle of $k\alpha$, starting on the positive $x$-axis, and working clockwise. Each line segment below the $x$-axis has a counterpart line segment above the $x$-axis, and the $y$-value is strictly larger, therefore the polygon cannot return to the origin.

JMP
  • 22,637