On the wiki there is this section about sub sigma-algebras for the first $n$ coin flips
Specifically, they say that after the first $n$n coin flips we can describe the observed information in terms of the sub sigma-algebra
$$\tag{1} \mathcal{G}_n = \{A\times \{H,T\}^\infty:A\subset\{H,T\}^n\} $$ Then they say that $$ \mathcal{G}_1\subset \mathcal{G}_2 \subset \mathcal{G}_3 \subset \dots \subset \mathcal{G}_\infty $$ I don't see why this subset relation between the sets is true (intuitively, we "know more" after more coin flips)
Perhaps the wiki should say "the sub sigma-algebra for the first $n$ flips is the sigma algebra generated by sets of the form $\mathcal{G}_n$?
Specifically, according to (1), $\mathcal{G}_1$ should contain all sequences that start with either an $H$ or a $T$.
Similarly, $\mathcal{G}_2$ should contain all sequences that start with an element of the set $\{\{H,T\},\{H,H\},\{T,H\},\{T,T\}\}$
but all these sequences in $\mathcal{G}_2$ start with either an $H$ or a $T$, so shouldn't they be in $\mathcal{G}_1$ as well?
Am I just reading the notation wrong and the sigma algebra is actually a sigma algebra that contains sets of the form $\mathcal{G}_n$. (i.e., perhaps $\mathcal{G}_1$ should be a set that has 4 elements: the empty set, the set of all infinite sequences, a set of all sequences starting with $H$, and a set of all sequences starting with $T$. Then $\mathcal{G}_2$ would be the above set, along with the set of all sequences starting with $(H,T)$ and so on, plus complements and unions)?
Thanks