Suppose $A,B$ are symmetric, positive semi-definite matrices of same order such that $A \preceq B \preceq \kappa A$. How to prove that this is equivalent to $\frac{1}{\kappa}A^+ \preceq B^+ \preceq A^+$? Here $A^+$ is the generalized inverse of $A$.
2 Answers
If $A^+$ is in particular the Moore Penrose inverse, then we can proceed as follows: There exists an orthogonal matrix $U$ such that $$ \tilde A = U^TAU = \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} $$ where $A_0$ is invertible (i.e. strictly positive definite). We now have $$ A \preceq B \preceq \kappa A \implies\\ \tilde A \preceq \tilde B \preceq \kappa \tilde A \implies\\ U^TAU \preceq U^TBU \preceq \kappa U^TAU \implies\\ \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} \preceq \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} \preceq \kappa \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Now, from the right-side inequality, we have $$ \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} - \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} = \pmatrix{A_0 - \kappa B_{11} & -B_{12}\\ -B_{21} & -B_{22}} \succeq 0 \tag{RHS} $$ and from the left-side inequality, we have $$ \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} - \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} = \pmatrix{B_{11} - A_0 & B_{12}\\ B_{21} & B_{22}} \succeq 0 \tag{LHS} $$ Now, since any principal submatrix of a positive semidefinite matrix is also positive semidefinite, we have $B_{22} \succeq 0$ and $-B_{22} \succeq 0$, which must mean that $B_{22} = 0$. Since $\tilde B$ is positive semidefinite, we have $$ \pmatrix{x^T & y^T} \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & 0}\pmatrix{x\\y} \geq 0 \implies\\ x^TBx - 2x^TB_{12}y \geq 0 $$ Noting that the above must hold for all choices of $x,y \in \Bbb R^n$, conclude that $x^TB_{12} = 0$ for all $x \in \Bbb R^n$, which is to say that $B_{12} = B_{21}^T = 0$. Thus, we have $$ \tilde B = U^TBU = \pmatrix{B_{11} & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Now, it suffices to show that $\tilde A^+ \preceq \tilde B^+ \preceq \kappa \tilde A^+$. To that effect, note that $$ A_0 \preceq B_{11} \preceq \kappa A_0 $$ is an inequality of strictly positive definite matrices. Thus, we have $$ A_0^{-1} \succeq B_{11}^{-1} \succeq (\kappa A_0)^{-1} = \frac 1 \kappa A_0^{-1} $$ Finally, we have $$ \frac 1{\kappa}\tilde A^+ = \pmatrix{\frac 1 \kappa A_0^{-1} & 0\\0 & 0} \preceq \tilde B^+ = \pmatrix{B_{11}^{-1} & 0\\0 &0} \preceq \tilde A^+ = \pmatrix{A_0^{-1} & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Thus, we can reach the desired conclusion. In particular: $$ \frac 1{\kappa} A^+ = U[\frac 1{\kappa}\tilde A^+]U^T \preceq \tilde B^+ = UB^+U^T \preceq A^+ = U\tilde A^+ U^T $$
Regarding the comment:
Lemma: if $A \preceq B$ are positive definite matrices, then $A^{-1} \succeq B^{-1}$
Proof: Note that $$ A \preceq B \implies\\ B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2} \preceq I \implies\\ \text{all eigenvalues of } B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2} \text{ are less than } 1 \implies\\ \text{all eigenvalues of } [B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2}]^{-1} \text{ are more than } 1 \implies\\ B^{1/2}A^{-1}B^{1/2} \succeq I \implies\\ A^{-1} \succeq B^{-1} $$
- 234,171
- 12
- 184
- 355
-
How is it true positive definite matrices? – Sudipta Roy Nov 17 '17 at 05:03
-
@SudiptaRoy I don't understand your comment – Ben Grossmann Nov 17 '17 at 05:16
-
You have used the fact for strictly positive definite matrices at the end of your answer. ("is an inequality ....") – Sudipta Roy Nov 17 '17 at 05:26
-
Now I get it. See my latest edit. – Ben Grossmann Nov 17 '17 at 06:02
-
@Omnomnomnom How can thsi be extendend if we are not using Moore Penrose generalized inverse? – Manuel Oct 08 '18 at 18:12
-
@Manuel I suspect that this doesn't hold for all generalize inverses. I had assumed that the original asker was talking about the Moore Penrose inverse specifically – Ben Grossmann Oct 08 '18 at 19:07
-
@Omnomnomnom Do you Think this result can be extended to $ 0 \leq A \leq B \implies B^{+} \geq A^{+}$ withthe m oore Penrose inverse? In this case $A_0$ and $B_{11}$ are not necessarly the same size. – Manuel Oct 09 '18 at 21:26
-
@Manuel Yes, that result holds. The proof is a bit different, though. – Ben Grossmann Oct 09 '18 at 22:01
-
@Omnomnomnom you might be interested in this answer https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2950304/does-0-leq-a-leq-b-implies-0-leq-b-dagger-leq-a-dagger/2950339#2950339 – Manuel Oct 15 '18 at 14:33
Using Schur complement:
$$A\leq B\Leftrightarrow \left[\begin{array}{cc}A&I\\I&B^{-1}\end{array}\right]\leq 0\Leftrightarrow B^{-1}-A^{-1}\leq0 \Leftrightarrow B^{-1}\leq A^{-1}$$
$$B\leq \kappa A\Leftrightarrow \left[\begin{array}{cc}B&I\\I&\frac{1}{\kappa}A^{-1}\end{array}\right]\leq 0\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\kappa} A^{-1}-B^{-1}\leq0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\kappa} A^{-1}\leq B^{-1}$$
- 625