4

Let $M,N$ topological spaces, $F:M\to N$ a continuos map is proper if (by definitios) $F^{-1}(K)$ is compact for any $K\subseteq N$ compact. Suppose now that $M,N$ are locally compact and Hausdorff. Then the following are equivalent:

1)$F$ is proper

2)$F$ is closed and $F^{-1}(q)$ is compact for any $q\in N$

I'm able to prove the implication 1)$\Rightarrow$2), but not the converse.

Let $K$ a compact subset of $N$, then it's closed (beacuse N is Hausdorff), so an idea could be to prove that $F^{-1}(K)$ is contained in some compact subset. A way can be these (it's not suggested by the exercise, it's only a my perhaps wrong idea): Prove that for each $P\in N$ there is some $V_P$ compact neighborhood s.t its preimage is compact (one i think should use here the local-compactness property and the fact that F^{-1}(P) is compact). $K$ is contained a finite union of neighborhoods of such kind (by compactness of K), then $F^{-1}(K)$ is contained in a closed union of compacts, which are the preimage of the neighbouroods

DDT
  • 757

1 Answers1

4

I’ll use theorems from “General topology” by Ryszard Engelking (Heldermann Verlag, Berlin, 1989). In fact, you are dealing with basic properties of perfect maps, which are exactly continuous maps $f$ from a Hausdorff space $M$ to a space $N$, satisfying 2). That is you have proved that each proper map between given $M$ and $N$ is perfect. The converse implication (without any restrictions imposed on spaces $M$ and $N$) is the subject of

enter image description here enter image description here

In our case the equivalence between proper and perfect maps also follows from

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

Also if we already have a perfect map then it suffices to require that only one of the spaces $M$ and $N$ is locally compact due to preservation of (local) compactness and Hausdorffness by perfect maps.

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

Alex Ravsky
  • 106,166