0

Lets say we have a function $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$. How is it possible to tell that we cannot find the anti-derivative of the function? Is there any specific test for it?

mvw
  • 35,114

1 Answers1

0

If you mean anti-derivatives in general, there seems to be no simple test.

However mathematicians have proven that certain classes of functions have an anti-derivative. E.g. a continous function has an anti-derivative. So all tests that prove a function to be continous would apply.

For the more weird cases see here.

mvw
  • 35,114
  • how about exp(x^2) ? that can be proved to be not integrable without the error function, which is defined in terms of the integral of exp(x^2) - if a function is continuous and continuously differentiable, then it is always possible to integrate its Taylor Series expansion - then call that function – Cato Sep 14 '16 at 10:53
  • You mean $e^{-x^2}$. Has an antiderivative. That it is defined in terms of an integral expression or a special function is just a matter of convenience. – mvw Sep 14 '16 at 10:55
  • what is the antiderivative of $e^{-x^2}$ or $e^{x^2}$? Since they are surely continuous? – Cato Sep 14 '16 at 11:09
  • @AndrewDeighton $f(x)=\int_0^x e^{-t^2},dt$ has the property that $f'(x)=e^{-x^2}$. See http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/523824/what-is-the-antiderivative-of-e-x2/523831#523831 – egreg Sep 14 '16 at 11:33