@Johannes Gerer:
I think that a short answer is:
If root 1 is not excluded (by setting A=0), $p(n)$ doesn't decrease to zero as $n\to\infty$.
Now why $p(n)$ should decrease to zero as $n\to\infty$.
$\mathbb P$(lose after starting with $0)=1$, since having 0 means loosing by the definition.
Also notice that $\forall n>0:p(n)<1$, since there is a chance of not loosing ever.
Now since $\mathbb P$(get $+\$2)=\mathbb P($get $-\$1)=0.5$, hence
after having 1 we either get 0 (with $\mathbb P=0.5$) or get 3 (with $\mathbb P=0.5$),
So $\mathbb P$(loose after starting with 1)$=:p(1)=$
$0.5p(0)+0.5p(3)=$
$0.5+0.5p(3)>$
$0.5p(3)+0.5p(3)=p(3)$,
so $p(1)>p(3)$.
By induction we can show that $p(n)$ is decreasing with $n$.
We can see that $p(n)\rightarrow0,n\to\infty$.
We can also see it from the following. We are equally likely moving up and down. But steps up are twice bigger then down, so our game (which is a random walk) has a positive drift, and further we are from 0 more likely that we will never have enough steps down to lose.