I am acquainted with principal ideals relatively well but I am struggling to understand the more general definition of ideals generated by an arbitrary subset of a ring. I suppose my question comes down to, what does $RX$ really mean? Where $R$ a commutative ring and $X$ a subset of $R$. Examples would be helpful.
-
Presumably you are considering rings with $1.,$ If not, you should state that. – Bill Dubuque Jan 29 '15 at 15:24
2 Answers
Let $R$ be a ring, and $\{r_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}\subset R$. The ideal generated by $\{r_\alpha\}$ consists of all the finite sums$$\sum_{i=1}^na_ir_{\alpha_i},$$where the coefficients $a_i$ are just elements of $R$.
Take for example $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, the ring of polynomials in one variable with integer coefficients, and consider the ideal generated by $\{2,x\}$. It consists of all the sums $2a+bx,\quad a,b\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$. Note that this ideal cannot be generated by a single element.
- 19,998
-
6Note that this nice description of the ideal requires the ring to be commutative and unital. Without these assumptions, the description get rather messy (but these seem like fair assumptions given the formulation of the question). – Tobias Kildetoft Jan 29 '15 at 09:54
-
@TobiasKildetoft Oooh, I guess you're right. Actually, after so much algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, I just forgot that there were rings which are non-commutative... – Amitai Yuval Jan 29 '15 at 10:01
Hint $ $ By definition, if $X = \{a,b,\ldots\}\subset R,\,$ then the the ideal generated by $X,\,$ denoted by $\,XR\,$ or by $\,(a,b,\ldots),\,$ is the smallest ideal containing $\,X.\,$ Applying the closure propertes of an ideal
$$ \begin{array}{} & I \,\supseteq \,\{ a,\,\ b,\,\ldots\, \}\\[.3em] \iff & I \,\supseteq\, a R,\, b R,\, \ldots\\[.4em] \smash[t]{\overset{\rm\color{#c00}U\!}\iff} & I \,\supseteq\, a R + b R + \ldots\\[.3em] &\ \ =\{ a\,r_1\! + b\,r_2+\cdots\}_{\ \large r_i\in R} \end{array}\qquad$$
But it is easily checked that latter set is already an ideal, so necessarily the smallest such ideal.
Remark $\ $ The final equivalence uses $\,\rm\color{#c00}U = $ universal property of the ideal sum, which specializes to the gcd universal property in principal ideal domains, since there "contains = divides", i.e.
$$\begin{align} I\supseteq A,B,\ldots\!\! &\!\! \overset{\rm\color{#c00}U\!\!}\iff I\,\supseteq\ A+B+\cdots\\[.3em] \leadsto\ \ i\mid a,b,\ldots\!\! &\iff i\mid \gcd(a,b,\ldots) \end{align}$$
when specialized to principal ideals$\, A = (a),\ B = (b)\,$ in a PID.
- 282,220