The question has been asked before, but I can't seem to wrap my head around it. I guess I'm missing something.
There is a certain part where I'm experiencing problems, and I can't seem to find an answer to that specific part in the other question(s).
If $f$ is entire and $\lim_{z\to \infty} f(z)= \infty$ then $f$ is polynomial.
Proof:
Since $f$ is entire it can be expanded as a Taylor-series.
$$f(z) =\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} a_n z^n$$
To prove $f$ would be polynomial I would have to prove $(\exists N)(\forall n > N)(a_n = 0)$
Define:
$$g(z) = f\left( \frac{1}{z}\right) = \sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} a_n\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)^n$$
Since $0$ is a pole (see below) of $g(z)$ the expansion above would be it's corresponding Laurent-expansion. And by definition of a pole $(\exists N)(\forall n >N)(a_n = 0)$.
Q.E.D.
However
Why is $0$ a pole of $g(z)$, why does $\lim_{z \to \infty} f(z) = \infty$ imply $0$ to be a pole of $g(z)$? I know $\lim_{z \to \infty} f(z) = \infty$ implies $\infty$ to be a pole of $f(z)$, but then...?