If we find a problem we know for sure is in NP but not in NP-complete or P, we'll have proved P!=NP. One approach then is to identify problems in NP (but not P) we haven't been able to show to be NP-complete so far and try to prove they aren't in that set. Any examples of such problems? Preferably one problem per answer?
Asked
Active
Viewed 55 times
1 Answers
2
The language constructed in the proof of Ladner's Theorem.
See also the Wikipedia page on the NP-intermediate class, which contains a list of problems that might be in NP-intermediate.
Steven
- 29,724
- 2
- 29
- 49